Page 1 of 2

Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: August 10th, 2004, 7:02 am
by zip3ace
which hoods in LA got the least amount of people but still maintain their existence?

I thought the Pasadena Bloods would... just the name sounds small alone.

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: August 10th, 2004, 1:09 pm
by Cutthroat333
YOU TRIPPIN HOMIE. IF THATS WHAT YOU THINK THEN YOU OUGHTA VISIT PASADENA SOMETIME AND TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK THEN...

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: August 11th, 2004, 2:12 am
by Y.G.
LOL.

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: August 11th, 2004, 7:21 am
by zip3ace
I got a FEDS magazine with them ni99az on the kover. And the dude talking was speaking like he was getting served constantly by the mexicans. Im talking about the set kalled Pasadena Bloods, not all bloods sets in Pasadena.

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: August 11th, 2004, 8:02 am
by Cutthroat333
??? THERE IS NO SUCH SET AS "PASADENA BLOODS". BEST TO WRITE A LETTER TO FEDS MAGAZINE AND TELL EM THEY STUPID. IF U THINK IT IS THEN PLEASE TELL ME WHERE THEY TERRITORY AT AND WHO IS THEIR #1 ENEMIES. OTHER THAN THAT I'M TELLIN U THEY HAVE NO EXISTENCE. LOL I AINT EVEN HEARD OF FED MAGAZINE, THEY ACTUALLY GOT THAT? PERHAPS ITS A NEWSLETTER FOR SNITCHES...

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: August 11th, 2004, 11:32 am
by jb7777
denver lanes

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: August 11th, 2004, 1:57 pm
by zip3ace
Cutthroat333 wrote:??? THERE IS NO SUCH SET AS "PASADENA BLOODS". BEST TO WRITE A LETTER TO FEDS MAGAZINE AND TELL EM THEY STUPID. IF U THINK IT IS THEN PLEASE TELL ME WHERE THEY TERRITORY AT AND WHO IS THEIR #1 ENEMIES. OTHER THAN THAT I'M TELLIN U THEY HAVE NO EXISTENCE. LOL I AINT EVEN HEARD OF FED MAGAZINE, THEY ACTUALLY GOT THAT? PERHAPS ITS A NEWSLETTER FOR SNITCHES...


Its the same magazine that got the T. Rodger interview. There one with a mike conception interview also. an earlier one had OG Mack interview. I'll find it and scan it for yall.

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: August 11th, 2004, 8:40 pm
by zip3ace
the OG from Pasadena Bloods name is Poochie. He said he was from Ohio and came out there. Everyone thought he was blood kuz he would always say "Blood", slang for brother. Thats how it started. But anyway... back to the topic.

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: August 12th, 2004, 2:09 am
by Y.G.
zip3ace wrote:the OG from Pasadena Bloods name is Poochie. He said he was from Ohio and came out there. Everyone thought he was blood kuz he would always say "Blood", slang for brother. Thats how it started. But anyway... back to the topic.


BUMP THOSE MAGAZINES AND DOCUMENTARIES.

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: August 12th, 2004, 8:19 am
by Cutthroat333
Y.G. wrote:
zip3ace wrote:the OG from Pasadena Bloods name is Poochie. He said he was from Ohio and came out there. Everyone thought he was blood kuz he would always say "Blood", slang for brother. Thats how it started. But anyway... back to the topic.


BUMP THOSE MAGAZINES AND DOCUMENTARIES.


YEA I AGREE with YG, BUT YOU KNOW WHAT? I SEE IT NOW. WHAT YOU REALLY READ IS THAT SOME GUY NAME POOCHIE FROM OHIO WENT TO CALIFORNIA WHERE HE ENDED UP RUNNIN INTO SOME BLOODS IN PASADENA. THEY PROBABLY FIGURED HIM TO BE AN ALLY AT FIRST BECAUSE HE HAPPENED TO USE "BLOOD" AS A TERM TO MEAN "BROTHER". AND HE HAD NO IDEA THAT IT WAS AN ACTUAL GANG TERM IN CALI. HE LEARNED SOMETHING NEW ON HIS VACATION TO LA. GOOD FOR POOCHIE... :wink:

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: August 18th, 2004, 12:40 pm
by CHRIS
Cutthroat333 wrote:
Y.G. wrote:
zip3ace wrote:the OG from Pasadena Bloods name is Poochie. He said he was from Ohio and came out there. Everyone thought he was blood kuz he would always say "Blood", slang for brother. Thats how it started. But anyway... back to the topic.


BUMP THOSE MAGAZINES AND DOCUMENTARIES.


YEA I AGREE with YG, BUT YOU KNOW WHAT? I SEE IT NOW. WHAT YOU REALLY READ IS THAT SOME GUY NAME POOCHIE FROM OHIO WENT TO CALIFORNIA WHERE HE ENDED UP RUNNIN INTO SOME BLOODS IN PASADENA. THEY PROBABLY FIGURED HIM TO BE AN ALLY AT FIRST BECAUSE HE HAPPENED TO USE "BLOOD" AS A TERM TO MEAN "BROTHER". AND HE HAD NO IDEA THAT IT WAS AN ACTUAL GANG TERM IN CALI. HE LEARNED SOMETHING NEW ON HIS VACATION TO LA. GOOD FOR POOCHIE... :wink:


LOL

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: March 13th, 2005, 4:44 pm
by K1LLJOY
grave yard crips is short in numbers

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: March 13th, 2005, 5:05 pm
by Word
K1LLJOY wrote:grave yard crips is short in numbers


Word... I heard that there isnt much of them left... But you never hear anythin about them so I dont think they really maintain their existance....

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: March 14th, 2005, 7:32 pm
by SanFernando88
pacoima piru

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: March 15th, 2005, 10:54 am
by MIDTOWN SB
graveyard crips
hillside viscous crips

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: March 15th, 2005, 7:03 pm
by K1LLJOY
SanFernando88 wrote:pacoima piru


are you sure about that? pakoima piru real short in they own valley id say they atleast 30 deep out ther but in other places like palmdale
lancaster san bernardeno they pretty deep as a matter of fact thers more packoima pirus in palmdale and lancaster then any other outside gang and they all joining these lil gay clicks and they still gettin smasehd they cant hold down nothin.

Posted: August 14th, 2005, 5:43 pm
by fartherwest
All the Pbh

Posted: August 30th, 2005, 6:41 am
by George
Graveyard is still around, not deep but still around.

Didn't they have a shootout with SM17 or something like that?

Posted: August 31st, 2005, 2:31 pm
by Q
George wrote:Graveyard is still around, not deep but still around.

Didn't they have a shootout with SM17 or something like that?


sm 17?

Posted: August 31st, 2005, 3:16 pm
by George
Is it not Santa Monica 17 or 13???? I don't know

Posted: September 1st, 2005, 1:30 pm
by MIDTOWN SB
Santa Monica Gang 13 16st/17st

Posted: September 15th, 2005, 9:15 pm
by stamps
How about Kabbage Patch in Carson...I don't think they're big anymore,,I could be wrong.

Posted: October 1st, 2005, 9:37 am
by youngwun
Graveyard Ckrips aint never out bangin whenever I gotta roll down there for whateva reason. Maybe they aren't as hyped on bangin no more. Who they even fued with out there?

Posted: October 11th, 2005, 6:34 am
by George
Santa Monica 13 kinda confuses me. i hear different stories regarding their relations with Graveyard Crips.

SOmeone told me Graveyards and SM 13 share the same small area and beef it with Venice 13 and other bigger gangs.

Another person told me Graveyards and Sm 13 don't get along???

????

Posted: December 16th, 2005, 9:59 pm
by Al_Capone_aka_pNuT
most definitly Holly Hood piru

Posted: December 19th, 2005, 2:35 am
by Y.G.
NAW NOT REALLY, THEY AIN'T DEEP BUT THE HOLD THEIR HOOD DOWN FILA BUMP, D-DOG, STUMP, AMP, AND THE REST OF THE NIGGAZ. MATTER OF FACT I KNEW A NIGGA FROM YOUR HOOD THAT USE TO COME AND TRY TO BICK ON PANNES AVE. AND TRIED TO BE DOWN FOR A MINUTE.

Posted: December 19th, 2005, 7:28 pm
by bgcasper
[quote="Al_Capone_aka_pNuT"]most definitly Holly Hood piru[/quote]lolol but they still around ...what about butler block piru its on the map ??saw it online ??i knew butler blocc crips but didnt knew about the ruz ?

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: December 13th, 2009, 12:43 pm
by OG Redbone
SanFernando88 wrote:pacoima piru
THAT SHIT IS FUNNY 30 DEEP OK COME 2THA HOOD

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: December 13th, 2009, 12:47 pm
by OG Redbone
K1LLJOY wrote:
SanFernando88 wrote:pacoima piru
are you sure about that? pakoima piru real short in they own valley id say they atleast 30 deep out ther but in other places like palmdale
lancaster san bernardeno they pretty deep as a matter of fact thers more packoima pirus in palmdale and lancaster then any other outside gang and they all joining these lil gay clicks and they still gettin smasehd they cant hold down nothin.
WELL THIS POST IS VERY OLD BUT IF ANY THINK WE SHORT JUST ASK

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: December 13th, 2009, 5:03 pm
by H572DSTA
OG Redbone wrote:
K1LLJOY wrote:
SanFernando88 wrote:pacoima piru
are you sure about that? pakoima piru real short in they own valley id say they atleast 30 deep out ther but in other places like palmdale
lancaster san bernardeno they pretty deep as a matter of fact thers more packoima pirus in palmdale and lancaster then any other outside gang and they all joining these lil gay clicks and they still gettin smasehd they cant hold down nothin.
WELL THIS POST IS VERY OLD BUT IF ANY THINK WE SHORT JUST ASK
how yall manage 2 be kinda deep if yall got like 5 percent blacks in pacoima?

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: December 13th, 2009, 9:28 pm
by youngspade
Z^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Thats BADDD

Re: Which hoods have the least membership...

Posted: December 26th, 2009, 4:29 pm
by alexalonso
Barrio St. Andrews between Pico & Washington is about 10 deep