im from SD but i gotta disagree with this statement lolkorngo wrote:niggas are trippin' if they think deigo is soft. hellll nahhhh. i think deigo area is harder than l.a.
i was staying at that omni hotel, right by the padres stadium, and i see some fool get robbed hellla bad though. like shank shank shank took his shit.
LA is MUCH bigger in terms of area and population and a much larger percent of LA's residents are in the hood. makes for MUCH more activity which causes MUCH more violence and whatever else comes with the gang life.
San Diego is a big city too, but no where near LA. &yea its definitely a nice city but SD has MANY different areas- high class, upper-middle class, middle class, lower class and straight grimey. **compared to LA**, SD has a smaller percentage of people that live in the hood. but dont get it confused THERE IS HOOD IN SAN DIEGO.
all this affects the way the politics are run here in SD. a lot of you say that SUR gangs in general are a bunch of media hype and just go crazy trying to live up to it or exceed it, naw, kill that.
LA is hard as fuck, trust that. LA *EARNED* the certain image they get, they got tagged with it, they dont go around trying to CREATE it for the sake of being media-whores. what a stupid idea.
LA is a VERY large city with A LOT of hoods, LOTS of gangbangers, hoodlums, dealers, hustlers, customers, wannabees and bitches which causes for a LOT of various business to handle. AND THEY HANDLE THEIR SHIT.
and trust, cuz SD handles shit too, just not as loudly and as frequent as LA, cuz that comes with the size. simply put these 2 cities just operate differently, and in no way does SD have any kind of inferiority complex concerning LA, in fact LA gangs either get run out of town or end up claiming SD when they try to set up shop.
comparing LA to SD is like comparing oranges and limes. limes are smaller but still pack a punch.