Slavery of the Dinka people in the Sudan

These concepts are socially constructed and have been given much weight. What are your thoughts?

Re: Slavery of the Dinka people in the Sudan

Postby MiChuhSuh » December 14th, 2008, 1:24 am

cliffard wrote:sudan = no oil, no us/uk involvement. just that simple.


Sentenza wrote:
cliffard wrote:sudan = no oil, no us/uk involvement. just that simple.


They got oil. Its just that China is taking it right now.

China Invests Heavily In Sudan's Oil Industry

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Dec22.html


cliffard wrote:fuckin hell, my mistake, caught me out there...alright then how does this sound? no oil that we can get our hands on without more aggravation than its worth-no us/uk involvement.



LOL that was a perfect example of what I posted about more than two years ago.

MiChuhSuh on Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:40 am
MiChuhSuh wrote:No matter what America will lose.

I heard this one mosque talk about how America doesn't care and that's why we aren't taking much action.

Then I heard another group say that America is faking the situation there so we can use it as an excuse to get involved and spread influence
User avatar
MiChuhSuh
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
 
Posts: 480
Joined: November 8th, 2007, 10:48 pm
Location: School of Life

Re: Slavery of the Dinka people in the Sudan

Postby cliffard » December 14th, 2008, 3:53 pm

michuhsuh can you explain what you mean, i've lost you a bit there.....
cliffard
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
 
Posts: 664
Joined: March 20th, 2007, 5:03 pm


Return to Race and Ethnicity, Racial Relations & Racism



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest