^^^^LOLOLOL @ Pokeman and his post....good one. I was looking at it and a decade is 10 years...60's--70's--80's--90's--00's. So you know, that represents 5-decades right there. Not 50 years, but 5-decades..
You see the reasoin I like you is because you pay attention, but sometimes you do not overstand
Since '67, the Raiders have been in 5 SB's. In SB 2, in '68, y'all lost to Green Bay 14-33. - Decade of the 60's
In SB 11 in '77, y'all beat Minnesota 32-14.Decade of the 70's
In SB 15 in '81 y'all beat Philly 27-10. In SB 18 in '84, (the last SB y'all won, meaning a 20 drought) y'all beat Washington 38-9.Decade of the 80's
In SB 37 in 2003, Tampa Bay beat the hell out af y'all 48-21 Decade of the 00's
- Raiders did miss the 90's...
So you see, that yes, my post was misworded...I should have wrote: "The Raiders are the only team to compete for Super Bowls every decade except the 90's"
.....a true fact that can not be argued, well your own words point this out right...
Now to make you happy Poke, yes, I did mess up on the Pittman/Fields issue..but like I said, I don't follow expansion teams. I mean they are all the same to me, Pittman, Buckner, etc... They are basically irrelevant just like the Panthers are...And by the way, GOOD research. Hopefully, the Panthers will have a similar history of whoopin ass as the Raiders have...but we will who the worse of the worse is this Sunday...
Oh and by the way....only a fag would request someone be banned..that Pokeman was a real gay move on your part..but then again maybe you have that kind of relationship with the Admin of this site..