

thewestside wrote:This just shows how in denial you are. And the reasons you list prove you wrong - that he didn't come close to a New York Mafia family. Which is why you have to resort to another hypothetical! "If he had another 5 years." LOL!
Again, I was talking about New York. I have all the cases and names you've brought up regarding Albanian organized crime, as well as the ones that I've found through much better sources - not selective Google searches. It's hardly impressive. I still find more cases of Albanians working for the Mafia in New York than operating on their own there.
More like upsizing by you, you dipshit liar. This is all it says -
Colotti provided a connection to the traditional mob - whether to bargain[i] or deliver threats.
For instance, the Rudaj organization "took over from the Luchese family all of the gambling in Astoria in the summer of 2001," Treanor said.
At the time, the FBI videotaped Colotti meeting with Luchese consigliere Joseph Caridi, prosecutor Treanor said.
And after the Albanians shut down the Gambinos' Soccer Fever operation, the government observed Colotti meeting with Anthony Megale, acting underboss of the Gambino family[/i].
http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/new ... eds__.html
like i said, if the fbi focused on albanians alone. turned all their force towards albanian organized criem, they still couldn't make as many albanian oc indictments as italian. impossible. the language and secrecy barrier is too much.
More like their activity level and the threat they pose isn't that much.

CheGuevara wrote:at most, the guy amounted to half the colombos if even that. so he actually didn't come close. but he was gaining ground fast.
what are these websites where you get all your prime information from? and when you gonna lay the indictment comparisons for us?
Colotti provided a connection to the traditional mob - whether to bargain[i] or deliver threats.
For instance, the Rudaj organization "took over from the Luchese family all of the gambling in Astoria in the summer of 2001," Treanor said.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
like i said, here they just gave us two examples. it doesn't mean they are isolated incidents
which is why they are taking over new york

thewestside wrote:It took the Colombos decades to get where they are. But we're supposed to believe Rudaj and his band of merry men were going to do it in five if not taken down by the FBI? Riiiiiiight.
I'm still compiling all my research. But I half mixed feelings about posting it because we both know that you'll find some lame excuse to dismiss it because it proves you are dead wrong. Even though I also have links, as well as all the official government websites I have obtained them from.
Huge text - another one of the Johnny ingredients I listed. Notice how Johnny focuses on just the "delivering threats" part at the exclusion of "whether to bargain" and "to negotiate its way into gaining more territory and to get out of bad situations where the organization was at risk." Another Johnny ingredient - Cherrypicking! Also, there is no record of the Rudaj gang beating up any Colombo associates. But hey, why should that stop the myths right? Like when they through Lucchese guys out of a club naked. LOL!
So, as usual, all you have are assumptions. Yet you come here and talk as if them meeting with all the administrations of all the families was a fact. See what I mean?
which is why they are taking over new york
I know that you know this isn't true.


CheGuevara wrote:actually the colombos rose fast when they formed. although they have lost strength consistantly for about two decades
do your thing a ling virgin boy. shouldn't matter what i say.
didn't i tell you they took over all lucchese operations in astoria? who claimed anything about colombo associates getting beat? and also, they beat up two men, how they did it and to who is up for debate.
i never claimed they were meeting with all the administrations. i said bosses, underbosses, consiglieres (because i didn't know which ones they were) but i remember those three titles because i remembered this source but forgot the specific sentence
as usual, all you do is downsize. the fbi they meet with the mafia. then they give us two examples, and you say THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO TIMES IT EVER HAPPENED! EVER!
saviano said it. i believe him. it's true.

DutchGangster69 wrote:can you even bring up a source of how many albanian criminals are organized and operating in new york...they made grand theft auto 4 which i enjoyed beating them up with a russian character...


thewestside wrote:Every time you touch your keyboard you just show your ignorance. It took the Colombos over half a century to reach their peak.
do your thing a ling virgin boy. shouldn't matter what i say.
No, it doesn't matter what you say. Which is why I'm compling it for my own benefit. But I hate to throw pearls before swine, so to speak.
This article you're quoting says they beat up Colombo associates you dimwit. Read it again. The only Lucchese operation cited in the press releases or indictment was Stamatis. I'll believe that over this article.
More backpeddling. That is a "Johnny ingredient" I forgot to include. That's what an administration of a Mafia family is you moron - the boss, underboss, and consigliere. They didn't meet with all these of all the families. They met with one consigliere and one acting boss.
I prefer to go by the demonstrable evidence rather than pure assumption.
You don't give a shit about Saviano. You simply choose to quote him because he said something you want to be true. And his one statement is hardly substantial evidence to base your claims about Albanians taking over on.

DutchGangster69 wrote:can you even bring up a source of how many albanian criminals are organized and operating in new york...they made grand theft auto 4 which i enjoyed beating them up with a russian character...

CheGuevara wrote:fbi (cnn) said the same. it's true.

thewestside wrote:and it will likely prove untrue about the Albanians, who by the way don't have the numbers or sophistication of either the Chinese or Russians.
Well that was five years ago. The Albanians don't seem to have made much headway since then. And guess what, I'm willing to be it will be the same story in another five years.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/07/16/fbi.mob/index.html
http://www.nypost.com/seven/05102009/po ... 168444.htm

CheGuevara wrote:how do you know this? have you ever seen estimates of the albanian criminal faction in america? as for the sophistication thing, that was right. albanian criminals are more structured along clannish and neutral leadership.
what? this made no sense..
the first source state italian organized crime. not lcn. which i already stated was true. the second source is no more valid than my saviano source. in fact, this is not even as valid as the london daily magazine. it's practically the same thing. not to mention this was from 2007 and earlier.
anyways, i found it funny that the fbi stated yet again, only four ethnicities in both those sources. albanians, italians, chinese and russians. why would they only mention those four groups?

thewestside wrote:The Albanian criminal faction? LOL! What the hell does that mean? The Albanians operating here are the same diaspora groups you see with the Russians. They are not like a "faction" sent from Europe to run things here in the states. The sophistication difference is mainly in respect to their operations. The Albanians don't have the sophisticated labor racketeering operations of the Mafia or the sophisticated financial scams of the Russians.
The Rudaj bust was in 2004. It took 5 years before we saw another major Albanian bust in the "Operation Black Eagle" case earlier this year. Maybe we'll see another major Albanian case in 2014? Sort of goes against your claims that the Albanians are taking over anything. Yeah, I know, they are just too sneaky.
The evidence shows the LCN is far more active and has a bigger presence in the U.S. than the Albanians, with or without the Italian syndicates.
It doesn't matter what I say, you're going to go with your own assumptions about why they mentioned those specific groups. Another Johnny ingredient - Read-into-it sources.

CheGuevara wrote:lol idiot! albanian criminals no doubt have ties to european albanian criminals. big nicky in rudaj's group was an admitted gun runner for the kla. gazmir gjoka got his heroin from albania and he dealt in other drugs from there. xhevedet lika got his heroin from kosova.
if you are saying there is no tight connection to albanian criminals in america to the ones in europe, you're even uglier than i thought you were.
yes, actually they are too sneaky. even the police have admitted this. hmm, are you forgetting about the michigan trafficking group you dick? 75% of human trafficking in the state of michigan? that seems like a minor bust to you?
simply incorrect.
oh, i read into sources? care to explain how that is a bad thing? they were your sources first of all, and the same goes for practically any fbi source that comes out explaining the crime scene amongst organized criminals. they mention only four ethnicities. but again, this doesn't mean anything because thevirginside doesn't want it to.

No, I haven't forgotten about the Michigan bust. I've included that in my compilation of Albanian-related OC busts. And when you add them all up, it's less then impressive. But of course that's where you and your bogus claims come in about there are many more out there not getting caught because they are too slick. Welcome to Johnny's Albanian fantasy world.
How would you know? You've haven't looked at the evidence. You simply say what you want to believe and quote a few BS articles that have proven untrue. This is proof positive you really have no interest in the actual facts. Just spewing Albanian propaganda.
You constantly read into reports, articles, etc. things that are not there. You form your own interpretation, not on what the report or article actually says, but what you want it to say.


DutchGangster69 wrote:what about the mexicans?

DutchGangster69 wrote:what about the mexicans?

what about the mexicans?




the fbi has four main targets, italians, albanians, russians and chinese organized crime with italian organized crime being the most focused on.
however, if we're talking about criminals, mexican criminals are the leading group in america by FAR AND AWAY. the drug trafficking groups (and no, not the ms-13) are much bigger than any of the groups the fbi focuses on.

Faciulina wrote:criminals what? mexicans have more criminals because they are millions and millions but especially because they are new immigrants not because they are organized the italian mafia is FAR more orgfanized entrenched and powerful than mexican cartels both in usa and globally ndrangheta alone controls more drugs than mexicans


Faciulina wrote:the ndrangheta globally controls far more drugs than mexicans moron the mexican cartels abroad are present only in california they are nobody compared to ndrangheta


Faciulina wrote:mexican cartels are not in 187 american cities maybe mexican gangs but not the cartels and they don't control drugs in the eastern coast


Faciulina wrote:it depends on the place in new york the italians are far stronger than mexicans in california mexicans are stronger but the italian mafia is far stronger in united states and globally than mexican cartels

Return to Canada street gangs & US Organized Crime
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest