Farrakhan rips "wicked jews" in hollywood
-
- Middle Weight
- Posts: 164
- Joined: February 9th, 2006, 11:36 am
Farrakhan rips "wicked jews" in hollywood
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006 ... shtml?s=ic
Hmmm, where's the outrage? Double standards all the time!
Hmmm, where's the outrage? Double standards all the time!
-
- Light Heavy Weight
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: January 17th, 2006, 11:09 pm
- Location: right here at home
-
- Middle Weight
- Posts: 596
- Joined: March 5th, 2004, 2:00 am
- Country: Afghanistan
- If in the United States: California
- What city do you live in now?: USA
- Location: Ca
- Contact:
I've never been on the Jew bashing bandwagon. There are approximately an estimated 40,000 Black Jews in America. Black Jews exist on the margins of Jewish society but not accepted by them. There's also exist a black underclass of Ethiopian Jews in Israel. In Farrakhan's article he's constantly referring to 'fake' Jews. So he may be referring to the outright rejection of the mainstream Jews of lighter skin toward Jews of darker skin!
-
- Middle Weight
- Posts: 705
- Joined: October 7th, 2005, 1:57 am
- Location: compton
-
- Middle Weight
- Posts: 705
- Joined: October 7th, 2005, 1:57 am
- Location: compton
I GOT THIS OFF ANOTHER POST BUT ITS VERY INTERSTING AND I CAN DEFINETLY INDENTIFY WITH IT, JEWS HAVE BEEN KNOWN TO BE THE WORLD'S BANKERS:
Economic individualism: In a National Socialist society, unlike Communism, there is certainly private ownership of property and land, and there is private ownership of possessions and capital. But unlike Capitalism, though, financial interests are curtailed and restricted at the point where they begin to have a negative effect on the folkish state. One example of this might be the charging of usurious interest rates on loans, which binds the working class into the slavery of an endless debt/interest cycle. Interest rates for the public should never be raised past a fraction of a percent, and this should be set in place by the central nationalized bank (Reichsbank) and this rate controlled by the Minister of Finance through the President of the Reichsbank. The charging of interest on loans by any other organization or business or individual is strictly forbidden, for that is the acquisition of income for those not employed or making no effort which is also forbidden.
Usury forbidden: That last statement might come as a shock to some of you, namely; that the gaining of income without work should be forbidden. Allow me to explain. When an individual is gaining wealth through means whereby he is not contributing an equal amount of effort in exchange, it means that somewhere along the way someone is making more effort than he should in order to feed and clothe and house this individual who is contributing nothing himself. That should be considered nothing short of slavery by any civilized society, and that's exactly what usury is. Money or wealth by its very nature does not replicate itself. If Paul keeps a dollar bill for a hundred years, at the end of that time he still has a dollar bill, it is worth no more than it was a century earlier. If he lends that dollar bill to Josef and Josef agrees to pay Paul a dollar-fifty at the end of that hundred years, then effectively, all Paul's done is manage to exploit Josef at a time of need, for his own profit. Say that your brother was starving, would you force him to work like a slave for you before you gave him a meal? Certainly no civilized man would do such a thing to his own brother. One must certainly wonder why the so-called civilized men of the world today would think nothing of doing the same to his fellow racial countryman in the form of usury. This is not an Aryan trait, rather a Jewish one. Jews are predominantly behind the usurious practices in our society with absolutely criminal 25% interest rates and the like. Slavery and exploitation are not what racial comrades do to one another, and that is why in the folkish state this usurious slavery is forbidden.
----ITS A NAZI RELATED POST BUT I SURE ANYONE CAN RELATE TO IT, BLACKS MEXICANS WHITES...ANYONE, WHO AGREES WITH ME OR DISAGREES?
Economic individualism: In a National Socialist society, unlike Communism, there is certainly private ownership of property and land, and there is private ownership of possessions and capital. But unlike Capitalism, though, financial interests are curtailed and restricted at the point where they begin to have a negative effect on the folkish state. One example of this might be the charging of usurious interest rates on loans, which binds the working class into the slavery of an endless debt/interest cycle. Interest rates for the public should never be raised past a fraction of a percent, and this should be set in place by the central nationalized bank (Reichsbank) and this rate controlled by the Minister of Finance through the President of the Reichsbank. The charging of interest on loans by any other organization or business or individual is strictly forbidden, for that is the acquisition of income for those not employed or making no effort which is also forbidden.
Usury forbidden: That last statement might come as a shock to some of you, namely; that the gaining of income without work should be forbidden. Allow me to explain. When an individual is gaining wealth through means whereby he is not contributing an equal amount of effort in exchange, it means that somewhere along the way someone is making more effort than he should in order to feed and clothe and house this individual who is contributing nothing himself. That should be considered nothing short of slavery by any civilized society, and that's exactly what usury is. Money or wealth by its very nature does not replicate itself. If Paul keeps a dollar bill for a hundred years, at the end of that time he still has a dollar bill, it is worth no more than it was a century earlier. If he lends that dollar bill to Josef and Josef agrees to pay Paul a dollar-fifty at the end of that hundred years, then effectively, all Paul's done is manage to exploit Josef at a time of need, for his own profit. Say that your brother was starving, would you force him to work like a slave for you before you gave him a meal? Certainly no civilized man would do such a thing to his own brother. One must certainly wonder why the so-called civilized men of the world today would think nothing of doing the same to his fellow racial countryman in the form of usury. This is not an Aryan trait, rather a Jewish one. Jews are predominantly behind the usurious practices in our society with absolutely criminal 25% interest rates and the like. Slavery and exploitation are not what racial comrades do to one another, and that is why in the folkish state this usurious slavery is forbidden.
----ITS A NAZI RELATED POST BUT I SURE ANYONE CAN RELATE TO IT, BLACKS MEXICANS WHITES...ANYONE, WHO AGREES WITH ME OR DISAGREES?
-
- Light Heavy Weight
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: February 21st, 2006, 3:01 am
I'm not condoning what the minister said, but I think it was some what taken out of context. He said that "false jews, wicked jews" were doing this. I don't think he meant to say that ALL jews are wicked. Just these 'false zionist jews' the ones that some muslims believe are out to remove them from Israel and take back what Zionists believe is their land by any means necessary. At least that's how I read it.
I dont believe this shit. Now if i look at those statements ''mister'' Farrakhan made, it seems clear to me that he's discriminating,
Now as we all know this guy is black, and like most of us he's been discriminated against many of times during his life.
Even though he claims to be all about peace and freedom, this motherfucker (sorry but i lost all my respect for this man) goes out blaming Jews for all kinds of shit.
What makes it even worse is that there are gonna be loads of people that believe and live by exactly what he says, and that way, instead of fighting discrimination, he's simply makin it worse.
Now as we all know this guy is black, and like most of us he's been discriminated against many of times during his life.
Even though he claims to be all about peace and freedom, this motherfucker (sorry but i lost all my respect for this man) goes out blaming Jews for all kinds of shit.
What makes it even worse is that there are gonna be loads of people that believe and live by exactly what he says, and that way, instead of fighting discrimination, he's simply makin it worse.
-
- Heavy Weight
- Posts: 2079
- Joined: March 18th, 2004, 12:22 pm
- What city do you live in now?: New York City
- Location: L.A. to Brooklyn, NY
How is Farrakhan ripping 'wicked Jews' any different from Mainstream America's ripping of 'wicked Muslims'? One group demonizes a small group within the other. Once again I could bring up members of this board saying with a straight face that all Muslims in this country should be under surveillance, but nah I'll save myself from the whining and dramatic bitching I'd get in response.
if some redneck from alabama started ripping "wicked jews" you wouldnt be defending him. the only reason your using THAT argument is because its farrakhans doing it.Cold Bear wrote:How is Farrakhan ripping 'wicked Jews' any different from Mainstream America's ripping of 'wicked Muslims'? One group demonizes a small group within the other. Once again I could bring up members of this board saying with a straight face that all Muslims in this country should be under surveillance, but nah I'll save myself from the whining and dramatic bitching I'd get in response.
-
- Heavy Weight
- Posts: 2079
- Joined: March 18th, 2004, 12:22 pm
- What city do you live in now?: New York City
- Location: L.A. to Brooklyn, NY
I don't give a fuck about Farrakhan kid. The fact is you can't say shit about Zionists in NYC because you will be labeled an anti-semite. I'm saying qualms with a certain elite amongst jews is equal to qualms with certain extremists in Islam. But like emperor penguin said his message is being twisted.
You simple simon ass motherfucker.
You simple simon ass motherfucker.
-
- Heavy Weight
- Posts: 2079
- Joined: March 18th, 2004, 12:22 pm
- What city do you live in now?: New York City
- Location: L.A. to Brooklyn, NY
No I wouldn't defend a Nazi because a Nazi is for ethnic cleansing and killing of Jews. Farrakhan is similar to Pat Robertson, a man with wild ideas. He blames Jews for Homosexuality the same way Pat Robertson blames homosexuals for Hurricane Katrina. The same way the Minutemen blame Mexican immigrants for the economy.
Where are all these righteous people talking about discrimination against Jews when cats on this board talk about 'all muslims should be under surveillance'?
Where are all these righteous people talking about discrimination against Jews when cats on this board talk about 'all muslims should be under surveillance'?
oh so its fine for farrakan to talk trash, but not some white guy that just doesnt like jews? when farrakan does it it's raising awarness and speaking the truth, when a white guy does it it's racist. i see.
i hate jew bashing. everybody seems to have some dislike for jews. why? they've been shitted on for seriously the last 5000 years, nobody accepts their differences, and they just take it all. in a way, i kind of feel bad for them.
i hate jew bashing. everybody seems to have some dislike for jews. why? they've been shitted on for seriously the last 5000 years, nobody accepts their differences, and they just take it all. in a way, i kind of feel bad for them.
-
- Super Heavy Weight
- Posts: 5147
- Joined: February 12th, 2004, 9:17 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
-
- Light Heavy Weight
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: February 21st, 2006, 3:01 am
I don't think Farrakhan hates Jews. Muslims tend to have 2 different views, one of Jews and one of Zionists. I had the misfortune of talking to an extremist Muslim who loved his Jewish brothers, but HATED Zionists. These extremists view Zionists as those who want to forceably remove Muslims from the middle east and 'reclaim' their homeland. They believe 'Zionists' are the ones running Israel and the US. In this case it seems as if Farrakhan believes that it's "false jews and Zionists" that are taking over the US, hollywood and creating Homosexuals.
I'm not saying he's right. I'm saying he's not saying ALL jews are wicked. He's saying there are wicked jews out there that HE believes are ruining America and Israel. It seems that any time anyone puts the word Jew and Wicked in the same sentence, it upsets the masses. There are wicked jews out there, there are wicked blacks out there, and wicked whites out there. People in general are just wicked. Is Farrakhan right in what he's saying? I don't think so, but he has every right to say it. I don't think it's Anti-semitic, I just think it's stupid. The headline says it all. It's press doing what press does. Getting people to read it, and get upset. I didn't buy into it and I don't believe Farrakhans message was "ALL JEWS ARE EVIL!" like this article would like you to believe.
I'm not saying he's right. I'm saying he's not saying ALL jews are wicked. He's saying there are wicked jews out there that HE believes are ruining America and Israel. It seems that any time anyone puts the word Jew and Wicked in the same sentence, it upsets the masses. There are wicked jews out there, there are wicked blacks out there, and wicked whites out there. People in general are just wicked. Is Farrakhan right in what he's saying? I don't think so, but he has every right to say it. I don't think it's Anti-semitic, I just think it's stupid. The headline says it all. It's press doing what press does. Getting people to read it, and get upset. I didn't buy into it and I don't believe Farrakhans message was "ALL JEWS ARE EVIL!" like this article would like you to believe.
-
- Heavy Weight
- Posts: 2079
- Joined: March 18th, 2004, 12:22 pm
- What city do you live in now?: New York City
- Location: L.A. to Brooklyn, NY
Dang homie.se11 wrote:oh so its fine for farrakan to talk trash, but not some white guy that just doesnt like jews? when farrakan does it it's raising awarness and speaking the truth, when a white guy does it it's racist. i see.
i hate jew bashing. everybody seems to have some dislike for jews. why? they've been shitted on for seriously the last 5000 years, nobody accepts their differences, and they just take it all. in a way, i kind of feel bad for them.
Anyways, I never said what Farrakhan was saying was the truth. I said Zionism (which IS real not a figment of Farrakhans's imagination - did you see Munich?) is a problem because it's militant Judaism, just like there's Muslim extremism. You missed the point anyways because you're so caught up. I wasn't, and please read that first post again, defending Farrakhan as much as I was saying cats don't say shit when people call Islam evil or cast a net over all muslims. I mean Bush got most of America thinking Muslims are evil AND he spent billions of dollars fighting it, yet you want to point the finger at a easy target.
trill shit.....Cold Bear wrote:
I said Zionism (which IS real not a figment of Farrakhans's imagination - did you see Munich?) is a problem because it's militant Judaism, just like there's Muslim extremism.
I was saying cats don't say shit when people call Islam evil or cast a net over all muslims. I mean Bush got most of America thinking Muslims are evil AND he spent billions of dollars fighting it, yet you want to point the finger at a easy target.
-
- Middle Weight
- Posts: 705
- Joined: October 7th, 2005, 1:57 am
- Location: compton
ZIONISTS!!????
All jews by nature are zionists, they like all people around the world would certainly like a homeland which belongs to them especially if this homeland has been their's to begin with. So by trying to seperate zionists from regular jews all your doing is looking for an excuse to hate jews.
Like the arabs of the middle east, they say the same thing "we only hate zionism and zionists".
All jews by nature are zionists, they like all people around the world would certainly like a homeland which belongs to them especially if this homeland has been their's to begin with. So by trying to seperate zionists from regular jews all your doing is looking for an excuse to hate jews.
Like the arabs of the middle east, they say the same thing "we only hate zionism and zionists".
-
- Middle Weight
- Posts: 596
- Joined: March 5th, 2004, 2:00 am
- Country: Afghanistan
- If in the United States: California
- What city do you live in now?: USA
- Location: Ca
- Contact:
or how his whole crew got ran up on by M.C. Serch and guess what?afakasi wrote:anyone remember when Proffesor Griff said all that shit about jews on live radio?
most everybody was more down with Serch then Public Enemy
and i got nothing against P.E. Flav is my peoples cousin and him and chuck come out here and kick it with them
but point blank
Griff got punked by a jew
-
- Light Heavy Weight
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: January 17th, 2006, 11:09 pm
- Location: right here at home
oh, and farrakhan and malcom X and a few other prominent blacks arent all for ethnic cleansing or is it called something else when its sought by these type of people?Cold Bear wrote:No I wouldn't defend a Nazi because a Nazi is for ethnic cleansing and killing of Jews. Farrakhan is similar to Pat Robertson, a man with wild ideas. He blames Jews for Homosexuality the same way Pat Robertson blames homosexuals for Hurricane Katrina. The same way the Minutemen blame Mexican immigrants for the economy.
Where are all these righteous people talking about discrimination against Jews when cats on this board talk about 'all muslims should be under surveillance'?
and Pat robertson is a butt wart
yes... lets blame jsut BLAME BLAME BLAME /// doesnt matter who or why.. as long no one has to do a little acceptance of others
-
- Middle Weight
- Posts: 760
- Joined: November 26th, 2004, 9:32 am
- Location: Los Angeles CA
-
- Heavy Weight
- Posts: 2079
- Joined: March 18th, 2004, 12:22 pm
- What city do you live in now?: New York City
- Location: L.A. to Brooklyn, NY
Jews are not all Zionists, streets. What the F? That's the craziest thing I ever heard, 'all jews are zionists'. Plenty of peace loving Jews who are not about violently removing Palestinians and fortifying Israel. And who says their homeland 'has been theirs to begin with' as you say? As far as I know they chose that homeland because it was promised in a book. Palestinian peoples are indigenous to that land, where is it written that it is 'Their land {the hebrews}' solely, besides in their own holy text?
Griff was disowned by PE and isn't that dude a small guy? Did Pete Nice try to hit him with his cane?
Griff was disowned by PE and isn't that dude a small guy? Did Pete Nice try to hit him with his cane?