NICKELS wrote:YES PEOPLE OF THE WORLD ARE NOT ACCEPTING WHITE WASHED LIES ABOUT HISTORY..........
like what??
NICKELS wrote:YES PEOPLE OF THE WORLD ARE NOT ACCEPTING WHITE WASHED LIES ABOUT HISTORY..........

NICKELS wrote:NOTHINGS FAIR WHEN ITS DONE BY ONE RACE OF PEOPLE ........FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TO FOLLOW. EUROPE WAS THE LAST OF ALL PEOPLE TO GET CIVILIZATION....THEN THEY STARTED CONQUERING AND DESTROYING EVERYTHING THEY COULD NOT UNDERSTAND OR FATHOM...NOW THEY TRY AND TEACH US BACK WHAT THEY TOOK FROM ALL OF US YEARS AND YEARS AGO........AND ALL THOSE WHO DONT FOLLOW THERE WAY OF LIFE , SPEECH , WALK AND "SCHOOLING "OR HAVE THERE MENTALITY OF THINKING ARE SUPPOSE TO BE LEFT TO THE SIDE OR MIXED IN THE BIG RACIAL MELTING POT ....WHITE WASHED.....WORLD DOMINATION.......RACIALLY OR TERMINATED.....LIFE AS WE KNOW IT.

perongregory wrote:the thing is racist whites or whites that just want to discredit anything a black historian, anthropologist, etc. claims just say he's an afrocentrist, like they aren't eurocentric.

perongregory wrote:no one is going to accept that BS fake history anymore.

blue eyed devil wrote:perongregory wrote:no one is going to accept that BS fake history anymore.
Whats fakeWe ruled for along time, how is our own history fake.
What history are they going to accept, Black history at its finest....I think thats the problem Peron, your disgruntled that theres never been a mighty Black empire thats ruled the world...When you talk about Whitewashed your talking about Blacks alone. Oriental history isnt Whtiewashed neither is Middle Eastern.

your entitled to believe what you want. Oriental history isn't totally whitewashed but we hardly hear about compared to western culture. the winners right the history...doesn't mean it's correct.


perongregory wrote:we live in a globalized world and in countries with diverse populations, who despite your racism all contribute to society. We should equally learn about everyone's history.




perongregory wrote:No it wont. Equal history.



perongregory wrote:Why do you get to decide whats insignificant? Are you a supreme arbitrator? Why are you an egomaniac? Of course we'll be learning about you, you guys are human, aren't you?

blue eyed devil wrote:You keep on going on about this White washed history.
Youve made this a Black vs White thing, when its not, never has been. Our greatest enemies where never tribesman from Africa, we didnt destroy all your books an send you back 2000 years.....Africa was already like that
Guess I didn't say this: "we live in a globalized world and in countries with diverse populations, who despite your racism all contribute to society. We should equally learn about everyone's history."
We havent White washed Indian history, that was the Persians with their caste system not us.
It was the Aryans you love so much, guess what mate, they're white.
Im sick of hearing Blacks an their crusade to Black wash history, like they even have a claim to do it.
I'm sick of hearing whites and their continual crusade to keep history in their favor. Like you have the right to say this dumb shit to me.
You see a Black doll in Germany an you think all Moors were Black. All armies leave descendants, so why isnt Southern Spain Black. Negroid genes are stronger than ours, you would think Spaniards would look Black, but they dont.........You fail
I already told you about Moors. you can continue to bring it up but we know the deal. I don't need to post up the other info and shit I've seen and researched because I've already posted some but It doesn't matter. A Moor could transport from the past and tell you their racial makeup and you still wouldn't believe it.
Wow, Dr. Blue Eyed Devil. That was some great thinking and research on your part. So you are telling me if black armies of the Islamic conquest conquered Southern Spain for sometime, and intermixed with the people but then were forced out for a couple centuries, and whites started to interbreed with the left over "mixed race" people, that now in the present, the Southern Spaniards would look like Wesley Snipes? Wow, never seen that before. I always thought if you keep mixing in more of one thing it turns into that thing, with slight traces of what it used to be. You know jet black hair unlike the blonde hair of northern Italians and Spaniards, dark ass skin unlike other Europeans and the northern people in their countries. But you know, you're so smart.
Thats why no one believes Blacks an their Black washed history, because its ridicoulous.

blue eyed devil wrote:perongregory wrote:Why do you get to decide whats insignificant? Are you a supreme arbitrator? Why are you an egomaniac? Of course we'll be learning about you, you guys are human, aren't you?
I dont decide whats insignificant. Theres thousands of years of History, id like too see what you intend to learn about, probably Black Dolls in Europe.

Haha, got your panties in a bunch. It's cool pull 'em out your ass. DOn't get made at me and make snide remarks, go back in time and get on the Europeans from the times of the MOORS and tell them they are insane, that they didn't actually see blacks. I guess those Europeans were Afrocentrist, huh?

Wow, Dr. Blue Eyed Devil. That was some great thinking and research on your part. So you are telling me if black armies of the Islamic conquest conquered Southern Spain for sometime, and intermixed with the people but then were forced out for a couple centuries, and whites started to interbreed with the left over "mixed race" people, that now in the present, the Southern Spaniards would look like Wesley Snipes? Wow, never seen that before. I always thought if you keep mixing in more of one thing it turns into that thing, with slight traces of what it used to be. You know jet black hair unlike the blonde hair of northern Italians and Spaniards, dark ass skin unlike other Europeans and the northern people in their countries. But you know, you're so smart.

NICKELS wrote:NOT TO EVEN MENTION SUMERIA AND INDIA.....WHAT WAS THE CONTINENT KNOWN AS EUROPE TODAY DOING AT THIS TIME , STILL MISTAKING DOGS AS SEX PARTNERS !?....LOL

NICKELS wrote:NOT TO EVEN MENTION SUMERIA AND INDIA.....WHAT WAS THE CONTINENT KNOWN AS EUROPE TODAY DOING AT THIS TIME , STILL MISTAKING DOGS AS SEX PARTNERS !?....LOL


Sentenza wrote:BTW, to get back on topic:
Here aresome Theories about Polynesians:
Current theories (from linguistic, archaelogical and cultural evidence) are that the ancestors of the Maori explorers derived from a migration of people of the Taiwan Ta-p'en-k'eng culture, around 3500BC, known as the Austronesians.
The Austronesians had been steadily squeezed south from Taiwan, by the expanding Chinese, and had moved down through the Phillipines, Borneo, Vietnam, Malaysia, Java, Sumatra, the Celebes, and across to the Solomons by 1600BC.
By 1200 BC they had arrived in New Caledonia, and in Fiji and Samoa, then expanded eastward to the Society Islands, the Cook Islands and the Marquesas and Tuamotu Archipelago by around AD1. Five hundred years later, the Easter Islands were inhabited, and around 1000 AD, Pitcairn Island - and then New Zealand.
This slow but relentless expansion of these explorers was spread across the largest known colonized area of the planet, and is a testimony to their courage - they were not walking across fields or paddling down mountain streams, hunting or trapping as they went. Ahead of them, beyond the prows of the canoes, were thousands of miles of unknown ocean, and the food they carried or fish they caught on the way - and into what uncertain future did they sail ?
Anyone disagrees?





Return to Race and Ethnicity, Racial Relations & Racism
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest