perongregory wrote:we don't know what jesus is doing. How do we know? And if people were using and have been using his skin color to go against his message, I think he would be down with someone bringing the truth to light. Cause if it really doesn't matter, then it doesn't matter if we find out what he really looked like.

MiChuhSuh wrote:perongregory wrote:they said they beat jesus till he wasn't recognizable...The Romans was tryna get to the white meat.
peron you got other people logging on your name like casper used to?
i can't tell if you're joking but if it's serious you know this makes no sense in terms of anything and everything in saying Jesus is this or that

johnnyblack eye to eye wrote:useless_person wrote:
Black Jews? What the hell?
Show me one.
Beta Israel is black do your homework.
This picture shows moses leading his people out of egypt. this picture comes from the dura europos synagogue in syria. it is the worlds oldest jewish peserved synagogue and the jews painted it. i don't know maybe i need some glasses but from what i can see dude looks like a brutha to me.
okay now lets look at a painting of moses at the catacombs in rome.
dam dude went from black to white. how did that shit happen? i can't see how a jewish synagague that has a painting of moses that the jews painted is black but yet the one rome has the dude is white. dude must've used some super duper bleaching cream.

johnnyblack eye to eye wrote:useless_person wrote:
Black Jews? What the hell?
Show me one.
Beta Israel is black do your homework.
i don't know maybe i need some glasses but from what i can see dude looks like a brutha to me.







perongregory wrote:oh yeah that look like alot of jews you see regularly...and those jews are from yemen and, other parts of the middle east, like my boys father.
perongregory wrote:white jews, do they look like that picture johnny posted?

BlaKK wrote:useless_person wrote:Bias BULLLSHIT!!!
Jesus was not black, he was white. People, if you think that he was back, come and talk to me when you have a grip on reality.
Like I done said, Jesus would have put his own face in the fire if it was white, and pluck his own eyes if they were blue. Get off that Self-fulfilling vanity shit Use_less. You know your shit is false. Jesus was not of powder.
Not that it matters what color Jesus was, I just had to get that out, Jesus was not white... Be assured. Use_less Has been watching too much of that white TV, where they portray Jesus as a light skinned blue eyed gay looking figure.

Dr. Gonzo wrote:perongregory wrote:oh yeah that look like alot of jews you see regularly...and those jews are from yemen and, other parts of the middle east, like my boys father.
What the hell are you talking about? Yonatan Sharabi was from Petach Tikva which is near Tel Aviv.
http://info.jpost.com/C002/Supplements/ ... /leb2.html
Here is a video of what Jews look like. And they look very similar to the paintings in Dura-Europos synagogue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIrhEQRIUmgperongregory wrote:white jews, do they look like that picture johnny posted?
Interesting how Johnny didn't show all the paintings from Dura-Europos synagogue.![]()
Like I said before the paintings in Dura Europos show Semetic looking people. If you and other people want to believe they were Black then so be it.
And as far as the Olmecs...There has NEVER been any Negroid remains found where the Olmes once ruled other then Mongoloid remains. I don't see why you are even bothering bringing them up.

perongregory wrote:I see some white looking people, some south asian looking people, some black looking people, etc. So what does a jew look like? Either you have to date when those pictures were painted and by who, or you have to conclude jews mixed in with a grip of differen't pops. and someone got around to see all of them and paint them, or that jews are basically any race.



perongregory wrote:And Gonzo I am saying when it comes to blacks of aniquity you cahnge up the criteria on what black looks like to suit you. doesn't look like the standard black, those are super dark white people, I mean what the fu--.

Curious where are the Black looking people? Those paintings come from the same place Johnny got his, Dura Europos. Why is it just because someone is dark they have to be black?

Dr. Gonzo wrote:Interesting how Johnny didn't show all the paintings from Dura-Europos synagogue.![]()

Dr. Gonzo wrote: Why is it just because someone is dark they have to be black?

Dr. Gonzo wrote:Is there no such thing as a tan?

black wrote:what the fu-- for? you know that them images clearly look like white people. and it makes sense since cause the romans was occupying that area. the romans have been changing the faces of images and burning stuff for the longest.
duros was captured by romans and persians and you know dam well that when ever nations conquer other nations they bring they culture with them and force their culture onto the conquered nations. so the images on the wall of duros will clearly go from black to white.
and this image here clearly has islamic/persian influence. look at the dude sitting in the chair that look like a persian outfit to me. and look at the broad to the right she look like a belly dancer.
black wrote:and this image right here that you say is an image of moses in his infancy clearly shows dude in the chair wearing a persian outfit. egyptians didn't dress like that.
black wrote:these moses clearly look different.
moses at the bottom left look like imam alzarqawi
moses at the bottom right look like a white essenes hippie.
moses at the top left could be a brother but they probably destroyed the face on purpose.
and moses on the top right look like a brotha
black wrote:semetic means mixed with black and white and these broads in the tub clearly look white. semetic my ass![]()
black wrote:as for the olmecs they is black. they found an elephant carving amongst some of the olmec ruins. how you think it got there? and how did the artist know what an elephant was unless he was african. asians weren't over there and them olmec heads sure don't look like an asian to me.
black wrote:Dr. Gonzo wrote: Why is it just because someone is dark they have to be black?
because we come in different shades
black wrote:this is a pic peron posted of miss ethiopia. you probably think she semite huh?
black wrote:semetic means mixed with black and white
black wrote:since when has suntan been a color or ethnicity? i guess wiggas can go out and get a suntan and that automatically changes they ethnicity from white to black.

Dr. Gonzo wrote:And as far as the picture having Islamic influnce that is completely ridicoulus since Islam wasn't even around back then.
Dr. Gonzo wrote:Oh I see...so the Persians, Romans left some paintings of Moses "Black" looking, and the others "white" looking? I thought you said whites turned the paintings from Black to White?

Dr. Gonzo wrote:So Semetic people are Mulatto? LOL
Dr. Gonzo wrote:Semetic people ARE NOT BLACK AND WHITE! There is even science that backs it up with DNA.
Dr. Gonzo wrote:Prove it. Find the Elephant, and find ANY kind of DNA. I'm sure if the Olmecs were Black they must of left Negroid skeletons, right? Or did they skip town before anyone one of them had a chance to leave any kind of physical evidence?
Dr. Gonzo wrote: Really? Semites come in different shades to, Einstein.
Dr. Gonzo wrote:What the hell are you babbling about? Answer the question. Is there no such thing as a tan? Or all dark people in the Middle East black?


black wrote:the dura synagogue dates to the 4th century islam came around in the 7th, that's like 300 years or so that's not a long time. besides their is no way of telling when they painted the persian pictures but i guarantee it came after the black moses picture was painted. the persian came after the ethiopian IUs (jews) got ran up off the scene.
black wrote:
look at it its right in front of you are you blind? moses cleary has 4 different shades in this picture. its literally going from black to white right before your eyes.
black wrote:look brainiac, sem is an egyptian word that has several meanings and one of those meanings is half. the word semite gets its meaning from this. semite does not come from the word shem. from which semites say they are a descendant of because shem is not a real person just like half the people in the bible. the latin word semi as in semi-te also comes from the egyptian word sem. semi meaning half like in semi-sweet, semi-circle, semi-aquatic, semi-final, Semi-Arian and semite. also if you read the bible and if you have any common sense then would know that god turned some of the original IUs (jews) white. and some of these white IUs (jews) mixed with the black IUs (jews) and out popped a fuckin semite.
black wrote:i do believe the human genome project and DNAPrint Genomics Inc say other wise.
black wrote:the town of jalapa mexico has an olmec musuem that has the little elephants on display. the next time you hit mexico why don't you look it up, it's always better to see truth with your own eyes. also the tuxtla statue has writings on it that is the same as the writings from west africa.
The Olmec civilization, which appears to have been of African origin or to have been dominated by Africans, was the Mother Culture of Mexico.
http://www.rense.com/general43/before.htm
black wrote:according to you semites have a tan and a tan ain't a shade.Dr. Gonzo wrote:What the hell are you babbling about? Answer the question. Is there no such thing as a tan? Or all dark people in the Middle East black?
what the fu-- a tan got to do with anything? what, you saying that darkskinned people in the middle east aren't dark? they just got a tan.
majority of the darkskinned people in the middle east are black. correct me if i'm wrong but i do believe they had a slave trade going on.



perongregory wrote:gonzo you buy into that BS perverted western history, but i bet you don't agree with the backwards shit they say about mesoamerica, and your ancestors. Im tired of these conversations cause they are ridiculous. Everywhere in the world where some muthafuckas look black they just dark skinned something else, but then when you get to the home continent of the blacks, Africa, the people aren't even blacks there, they dark skinned something. So I ask you, blacks cant be anywhere else in the world, but every other motherfucker can be in Africa, ridiculous shit
perongregory wrote:And gonzo just because that synogauge had diff. looking people dont mean original hebrews didn't look or weren't a certain people. You have to date each picture, and which culture painted the shit.
perongregory wrote:There has been a considerable relation between blacks and arabs for quite a couple centuries now. Johnny said the black admixture adds to the darkness. Explain the white looking Arabs to me. I've never seen a scandinavian make a swarthy and a light skinned child, unless he/she has mixed with a darker person. There's too much clouded BS history.

perongregory wrote:There has been a considerable relation between blacks and arabs for quite a couple centuries now.

Dr. Gonzo wrote:perongregory wrote:gonzo you buy into that BS perverted western history, but i bet you don't agree with the backwards shit they say about mesoamerica, and your ancestors. Im tired of these conversations cause they are ridiculous. Everywhere in the world where some muthafuckas look black they just dark skinned something else, but then when you get to the home continent of the blacks, Africa, the people aren't even blacks there, they dark skinned something. So I ask you, blacks cant be anywhere else in the world, but every other motherfucker can be in Africa, ridiculous shit
So there has never been a non-black presence in Northern Africa? If you think that then you are completely naive. So going by your thinking Alexander, the Caesars, Arabs couldn't of possibly made an impact there in which we are still talking about to this day, huh?
And guess what? Where the hell do you think Africa got it's name from? The Romans. So excuse me for not ignoring the presence non-blacks had on the dark continent.perongregory wrote:And gonzo just because that synogauge had diff. looking people dont mean original hebrews didn't look or weren't a certain people. You have to date each picture, and which culture painted the shit.
Hebrews/Jews/Semites don't all come in the same color just like Blacks and "whites" for that matter.perongregory wrote:There has been a considerable relation between blacks and arabs for quite a couple centuries now. Johnny said the black admixture adds to the darkness. Explain the white looking Arabs to me. I've never seen a scandinavian make a swarthy and a light skinned child, unless he/she has mixed with a darker person. There's too much clouded BS history.
So it's only possible for blacks to come in different shades? So anyone with dark skin gets it from black admixture?


Dr. Gonzo wrote:Get your facts straight. The Synagogue goes back to 244 AD. There is even an Aramaic inscription that dates to 244, and once again there was no Islamic influence around in the Middle East until 456 years later. Provide links to your proof instead of your own "theroies" that Islam was around the time of Xerxes I.
Dr. Gonzo wrote:
LOL
So let me get this straight. Whitey started painting the pictures white, and somehow ran out of paint and left the paintings of Moses dark?
Dr. Gonzo wrote:
Why would the Romans leave a dark Moses for people to see?
Dr. Gonzo wrote:
Really where is your proof? I posted mine where the hell is yours?
Dr. Gonzo wrote:
I guess you are one of the few researchers that think the Olmecs were black, eh? And why I'm not surprised you found no concrete evidence other then some article. Once again where are the remains of these Blacks? Why haven't any reasearchers displayed any Negroid skulls found in Mexico? You can't explain that part can you? LOL

Dr. Gonzo wrote:
Majority of darkskinned people in the Middle East are black? So this guys is black?![]()

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests