
looneytunes1 wrote:Chaos.





Sentenza wrote:Full scale civil war. Breakdown of Iraq. But it will happen anyways, so it makes no difference leaving now or later.

'X' wrote:My question is how high the death toll of the troops going to go up if they stay?
And for all those who want them to stay, how about YOU lace up your boots and volunteer. Don't be a cheerleading, bs flag waver, go and fight for country you say you "love" so much...Let's see those who claim to "love" america back that bs up and go fight "for the freedom" that many of us don't even have here...



Lonewolf wrote:
Do you really beleive that we can transplant the same "values" which
are cherished here >> and implant them in a people that have their
own culture, heritage and whose history reaches back "millenias" older
than our national history?

StillNoScript wrote:
If anyone supports this war, they should be in Iraq. They have no excuse not to be.
StillNoScript wrote:majority of people who support this war are too big of mark ass cowards to go and fight it themselves.
StillNoScript wrote:No respect for the sideline cheerleaders for this war. Congress should pass a law..any citizen that voted for anyone in congress who still stands by this war to this day, or anyone that voted for Bush, period, should be drafted automatically.

'X' wrote:My question is how high the death toll of the troops going to go up if they stay?
And for all those who want them to stay, how about YOU lace up your boots and volunteer. Don't be a cheerleading, bs flag waver, go and fight for country you say you "love" so much...Let's see those who claim to "love" america back that bs up and go fight "for the freedom" that many of us don't even have here...

se11 wrote:'X' wrote:My question is how high the death toll of the troops going to go up if they stay?
And for all those who want them to stay, how about YOU lace up your boots and volunteer. Don't be a cheerleading, bs flag waver, go and fight for country you say you "love" so much...Let's see those who claim to "love" america back that bs up and go fight "for the freedom" that many of us don't even have here...
your question will soon be answered...

BlaKK wrote:If the us leaves Iraq 300 billion dollars went to waste, to shit, 3000+ troops died for nothing, Iran would seize control of the chaos in the region and become even more influential,

rocstar wrote:BlaKK wrote:If the us leaves Iraq 300 billion dollars went to waste, to shit, 3000+ troops died for nothing, Iran would seize control of the chaos in the region and become even more influential,
The money already went to waste. Bush not trying to win a "war" right now he trying to save face. Like I said before you can't wage a war against an ideology, you want to get Osama for 9-11, fine do it. Take him out and all his homies. But to declare that you are traveling around the world stamping out terrorism everywhere (which by definition the U.S is a terrorist state, and more Middle Eastern terrorists come from our friends the Saudis than anywhere else) is ridiculous. Thats like declaring I'm god and everyone must all of a sudden follow my beliefs. Nothing changed in Iraq because they were never a threat to us. The only thing that the Bush regime did was topple the balance of power in the region and hand it to a real threat. Iran has been handed power like they never had and are getting stronger. The leaders of Iraq are working for Iran and Shiite interests only.



EmperorPenguin wrote: but he's never once waged war on his homeland against the KKK who are defined as a terrorist organization

'X' wrote:EmperorPenguin wrote: but he's never once waged war on his homeland against the KKK who are defined as a terrorist organization
You are not allowed to mention this fact^^, or any other facts like why the government never "profiled" those who look like timothy mcveigh, or those in waco texas...When we mention that, you should read the backlash...
Good post "ep" but many people do not want to deal with the truth you mentioned. They can't accept that "terrorist" label when it's thrown at people who look like them, and I don't think they would approve of the profiling that many of us of color indure...



rocstar wrote:EP and X yall aint making no sense. A terrorist can only be Black or Middle Eastern, Asian or a dark Latino. Spanish excluded. Stop acting stupid. Only homegrown terrorist groups the U.S ever had was the Black Panthers and NOI. Check the records.


but many people do not want to deal with the truth you mentioned. They can't accept that "terrorist" label when it's thrown at people who look like them, and I don't think they would approve of the profiling that many of us of color indure...

but many people do not want to deal with the truth you mentioned. They can't accept that "terrorist" label when it's thrown at people who look like them, and I don't think they would approve of the profiling that many of us of color indure...

EmperorPenguin wrote:'X' wrote:EmperorPenguin wrote: but he's never once waged war on his homeland against the KKK who are defined as a terrorist organization
You are not allowed to mention this fact^^, or any other facts like why the government never "profiled" those who look like timothy mcveigh, or those in waco texas...When we mention that, you should read the backlash...
Good post "ep" but many people do not want to deal with the truth you mentioned. They can't accept that "terrorist" label when it's thrown at people who look like them, and I don't think they would approve of the profiling that many of us of color indure...
That's the crazy thing though, they are terrorists in every form of the word. They have been labelled a terror organization and they are still a threat to national security (though some may argue on what level). Bush really needs to take a look inward and start worrying about those type of groups that are living (born and raised I might add) in America and leave the rest of the world out of his problems.
That's true, I get that sh*t all the time from white folks
"DO I LOOK LIKE A TERRORIST TO YOU"
And what is a terrorist supposed to look like huh?

frozen fire wrote:EmperorPenguin wrote:'X' wrote:EmperorPenguin wrote: but he's never once waged war on his homeland against the KKK who are defined as a terrorist organization
You are not allowed to mention this fact^^, or any other facts like why the government never "profiled" those who look like timothy mcveigh, or those in waco texas...When we mention that, you should read the backlash...
Good post "ep" but many people do not want to deal with the truth you mentioned. They can't accept that "terrorist" label when it's thrown at people who look like them, and I don't think they would approve of the profiling that many of us of color indure...
That's the crazy thing though, they are terrorists in every form of the word. They have been labelled a terror organization and they are still a threat to national security (though some may argue on what level). Bush really needs to take a look inward and start worrying about those type of groups that are living (born and raised I might add) in America and leave the rest of the world out of his problems.
there are many groups that can be named terrorists, but to whom are they terrorists, to whom do they oppose? as long as its not a big threat to the US, or its allies. they can be left alone for the meantime.That's true, I get that sh*t all the time from white folks
"DO I LOOK LIKE A TERRORIST TO YOU"
And what is a terrorist supposed to look like huh?
![]()
Another reason why america doesnt want people to know about all those terrorists organisations found in the US, is that people will say.......hold up, why travel half way across the globe to fight terrorism when they are found right here?? start here Mr president of the *free world*.


EmperorPenguin wrote:frozen fire wrote:EmperorPenguin wrote:'X' wrote:EmperorPenguin wrote: but he's never once waged war on his homeland against the KKK who are defined as a terrorist organization
You are not allowed to mention this fact^^, or any other facts like why the government never "profiled" those who look like timothy mcveigh, or those in waco texas...When we mention that, you should read the backlash...
Good post "ep" but many people do not want to deal with the truth you mentioned. They can't accept that "terrorist" label when it's thrown at people who look like them, and I don't think they would approve of the profiling that many of us of color indure...
That's the crazy thing though, they are terrorists in every form of the word. They have been labelled a terror organization and they are still a threat to national security (though some may argue on what level). Bush really needs to take a look inward and start worrying about those type of groups that are living (born and raised I might add) in America and leave the rest of the world out of his problems.
there are many groups that can be named terrorists, but to whom are they terrorists, to whom do they oppose? as long as its not a big threat to the US, or its allies. they can be left alone for the meantime.That's true, I get that sh*t all the time from white folks
"DO I LOOK LIKE A TERRORIST TO YOU"
And what is a terrorist supposed to look like huh?
![]()
Another reason why america doesnt want people to know about all those terrorists organisations found in the US, is that people will say.......hold up, why travel half way across the globe to fight terrorism when they are found right here?? start here Mr president of the *free world*.
I mentioned the IRA and the KKK because shortly after Sept. 11th George Bush stated he was going to rid the world of terrorist organizations, all of them both of whom have been labelled terrorist organizations. I guess he's too busy getting rid of the Arab and Korean ones, then he'll worry about the White American and Irish ones. I'm sure they're on his list, and I'm sure he's got a great plan on getting rid of them.



Return to Conspiracy Theories, Politics & Other Random Topics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest