


Saddam wrote:jesus, while he would have more conservative views on marriage, sexual orientation, etc, he still believed that they are people, and he would never want to condemn them, hate them, outcast them the same way the whitey republican party does.
Love peace patience kindess, goodness, all those things that Jesus stood for is beyond political party affiliation. Peace.
Lord, forgive me for this rip Im gonna take.
*exhales*

alonso wrote:Saddam wrote:jesus, while he would have more conservative views on marriage, sexual orientation, etc, he still believed that they are people, and he would never want to condemn them, hate them, outcast them the same way the whitey republican party does.
Love peace patience kindess, goodness, all those things that Jesus stood for is beyond political party affiliation. Peace.
Lord, forgive me for this rip Im gonna take.
*exhales*
Saddam, it was the southern Democrats, that outcast, condemn, and hate. DOnt sleep, they were the ones lynching, bombing churches, and burning crosses. Did you know that Al Gore comes from a family that are anti civil rights? If it were up to them, slavery would have lasted much longer in this country too. Dont e fooled.


NYorker wrote:So Alonso, I guess you could say that Jesus was the ultimate Independent Moderate.

alonso wrote:This is my best view on his positions based on what is written
Capital Punishment? not sure on this one because the scripture speak on an ey for an eye in the Hebrew Scriptures, but it suggests that this is something that God handles, not any state or governernment.
Abortion? Conservative, he would say not to destroying life no matter the circumstances, i.e. rape. incest, etc.
Taxes? Moderate, he advocated paying you due taxes, but I think he would think that todays' taxes are too much for the working man.
War? Liberal, he would never support warring between nations.
Welfare? Liberal, he would help and give to those that were less fortunate
Gay Marriage? Conservative, this is a no brainer, marriage as defined by his father is between a man and a women. He would be with Bush on this one people.
Crime Law? Conservative, if you do the crime you must do the time.

el tio wrote:NYorker wrote:So Alonso, I guess you could say that Jesus was the ultimate Independent Moderate.
That is not what Alonso said. Don't put words in his mouth.

NYorker wrote:el tio wrote:NYorker wrote:So Alonso, I guess you could say that Jesus was the ultimate Independent Moderate.
That is not what Alonso said. Don't put words in his mouth.
Hey El Tio.........stop "thoming" (being an Uncle Tom) and learn to read correctly the context in which I wrote. Where did I put words in Alonso's mouth? Keep making yourself look foolish....boy

el tio wrote:NYorker wrote:el tio wrote:[quote="NYorker"]So Alonso, I guess you could say that Jesus was the ultimate Independent Moderate.
That is not what Alonso said. Don't put words in his mouth.
Hey El Tio.........stop "thoming" (being an Uncle Tom) and learn to read correctly the context in which I wrote. Where did I put words in Alonso's mouth? Keep making yourself look foolish....boy

NYorker wrote:el tio wrote:NYorker wrote:[quote="el tio"][quote="NYorker"]So Alonso, I guess you could say that Jesus was the ultimate Independent Moderate.
That is not what Alonso said. Don't put words in his mouth.
Hey El Tio.........stop "thoming" (being an Uncle Tom) and learn to read correctly the context in which I wrote. Where did I put words in Alonso's mouth? Keep making yourself look foolish....boy

el tio wrote:NYorker wrote:el tio wrote:[quote="NYorker"][quote="el tio"][quote="NYorker"]So Alonso, I guess you could say that Jesus was the ultimate Independent Moderate.
That is not what Alonso said. Don't put words in his mouth.
Hey El Tio.........stop "thoming" (being an Uncle Tom) and learn to read correctly the context in which I wrote. Where did I put words in Alonso's mouth? Keep making yourself look foolish....boy


el tio wrote:It's been fun. Well not really but we need to dead this.
For the record Republicans are not the only one's that bomb people so your argument is useless.
Didn't Clinton bomb the Serbs in order to take attention away from Monica Lewinsky? Yes he did.
Anyways, don't forget to vote in November. No matter how confused you are you do have the right.

NYorker wrote:el tio wrote:It's been fun. Well not really but we need to dead this.
For the record Republicans are not the only one's that bomb people so your argument is useless.
Didn't Clinton bomb the Serbs in order to take attention away from Monica Lewinsky? Yes he did.
Anyways, don't forget to vote in November. No matter how confused you are you do have the right.
Republicans tend to be the "hawks" of our country.....they also tend NOT to have their own sons go fight. I give Republicans like McCain and Bush1 credit because they talked the talk and walked the walk.
No Clinton didn't bomb the Serbs because of Monica....Clinton was asked to send our troops their because of his alliance with NATO.
I will vote in November and I am definitely NOT confused....you are son.

el tio wrote:NYorker wrote:el tio wrote:It's been fun. Well not really but we need to dead this.
For the record Republicans are not the only one's that bomb people so your argument is useless.
Didn't Clinton bomb the Serbs in order to take attention away from Monica Lewinsky? Yes he did.
Anyways, don't forget to vote in November. No matter how confused you are you do have the right.
Republicans tend to be the "hawks" of our country.....they also tend NOT to have their own sons go fight. I give Republicans like McCain and Bush1 credit because they talked the talk and walked the walk.
No Clinton didn't bomb the Serbs because of Monica....Clinton was asked to send our troops their because of his alliance with NATO.
I will vote in November and I am definitely NOT confused....you are son.
So Republicans tend not to send their sons to War?
How many Democrats do you know that "send" their sons to War.
You either enlist or you don't go.
Nobody sends you to War. You send yourself.
During Vietnam there was a Draft that included everyone.
Stop making such STUPID statements. And then you compound your stupidity when you admit that Bush (1) went to War and Clinton did not.
And Clinton's lasting shame will be Kosovo.


NYorker wrote:...Kosovo , Serbia was a NATO action...........we are part of NATO fool...so your slanderous accusation regarding a Serbia/Lewinski connection shows YOUR ignorance...


Panik wrote:It didn't happen? Then who was buried in all the mass graves in Kosovo then? You are an ignorant bastard. I think Tio is really Rush Limbaugh, nobody else could spit so much garbage and really believe himself.

el tio wrote:Panik wrote:It didn't happen? Then who was buried in all the mass graves in Kosovo then? You are an ignorant bastard. I think Tio is really Rush Limbaugh, nobody else could spit so much garbage and really believe himself.
Are those the same type of mass graves that are all over Iraq!!!
People like you and Michael Moore think that Iraq was better off before the Americans got there.
Thanks for walking into my argument and making my point.

Saddam wrote:el tio wrote:Panik wrote:It didn't happen? Then who was buried in all the mass graves in Kosovo then? You are an ignorant bastard. I think Tio is really Rush Limbaugh, nobody else could spit so much garbage and really believe himself.
Are those the same type of mass graves that are all over Iraq!!!
People like you and Michael Moore think that Iraq was better off before the Americans got there.
Thanks for walking into my argument and making my point.
dood did u watch farenheit 911 yet? nah rite?

el tio wrote:Saddam wrote:el tio wrote:[quote="Panik"]It didn't happen? Then who was buried in all the mass graves in Kosovo then? You are an ignorant bastard. I think Tio is really Rush Limbaugh, nobody else could spit so much garbage and really believe himself.
Are those the same type of mass graves that are all over Iraq!!!
People like you and Michael Moore think that Iraq was better off before the Americans got there.
Thanks for walking into my argument and making my point.
dood did u watch farenheit 911 yet? nah rite?

Saddam wrote:
If its a battle of credibilty... lemme break it down for you.
Michael moore vs. Bush
Michael Moore TKO's Bush first round in 45 seconds.

el tio wrote:Saddam wrote:
If its a battle of credibilty... lemme break it down for you.
Michael moore vs. Bush
Michael Moore TKO's Bush first round in 45 seconds.
That is not a breakdown. That was a finally. Why don't you break it down for me tough guy. Fact by Fact.
Give me specifics about Bush and Moore.



el tio wrote:Do you guys realize that the Bin Laden family is HUGE!
Don't you remember that all the Bin Laden's came out and denounced Osama after the attacks happened. They know he is a certified head case. They want nothing to do with him.
Was Osama with Bush???
Do you remember how many Saudi's and other Arab's Clinton had over his place and how many hands he shook?
As for your other accusations, there is an important Chinese proverb: WHEN YOU DRINK WATER REMEMBER THE SOURCE. Michael Moore is a propoganda artist. He wants to manipulate everything he can to push his liberal agenda.
Panik you can respond but Saddam, until you change your screename I will no longer reply to you. Your decision to use "Saddam" as a screename is a direct insult and slap in the face to all the families that have suffered a lost son/daughter due to this War. And an insult to all the Iraq's he murdered in the thousands.



Return to Conspiracy Theories, Politics & Other Random Topics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests