bmore:city officials attempt for "martial-law"

Discuss gangs in the The South in the following states; Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington D.C. & West Virgina
Post Reply
Qdawg
Super Heavy Weight
Super Heavy Weight
Posts: 3926
Joined: December 20th, 2005, 4:42 pm
Location: Bx,ny-(secor houses) 2 bmore

bmore:city officials attempt for "martial-law"

Unread post by Qdawg » May 27th, 2007, 10:22 am

'Public safety' plan halted
Opposition pressure in City Council leads to withdrawal of idea
By John Fritze
Sun reporter
Originally published May 22, 2007

Baltimore's City Council overwhelmingly rejected a proposal yesterday that would have allowed the mayor to lock down streets and close businesses in areas declared an emergency - taking the unusual step of pressuring the bill's sponsor to withdraw the measures before they were fully introduced.

Eleven members of the City Council spoke against the legislation - proposed by City Council Vice President Robert W. Curran - that would have allowed police to close liquor stores and bars, limit the number of people on city sidewalks and halt traffic in areas declared "public safety act zones."

"i believe that the sponsor is intentioned, but I think it's a bad idea and I think it's a bad message to send," said City Councilman James B. Kraft. "I'm very concerned about the establishment of martial law in Baltimore."

Curran, who received national attention last week for proposing the legislation, was ultimately forced yesterday to acknowledge that it had virtually no support. In a surprising move, Curran volunteered to withdraw the proposal, and his motion was unanimously supported.

"I'm not going to have this tear this council apart," Curran said after several colleagues voiced their opposition. "I had good intentions when I put in these bills. I thought the appropriate thing was to allow the discussion. ... If I'm wrong and the murder rate goes up, God help us all."

The legislation would have permitted police to limit the number of people who could gather on sidewalks, in streets or in other outdoor areas in the safety zones and would have prohibited the sale and possession of weapons. Zones would have been established solely by the mayor, initially for two weeks, with the option to renew indefinitely.

Provisions of the bill were identical to a law in Philadelphia that recently gained attention when a mayoral candidate and former city councilman proposed relying more aggressively on the code. That candidate, Michael Nutter, won the Democratic nomination for mayor last week.

However, critics immediately questioned the constitutionality of Curran's legislation, and several members of the council noted yesterday that Mayor Sheila Dixon has been shifting away from the zero-tolerance policies of past administrations and toward an approach that focuses more attention on individual criminals.

"Mayor Dixon believes that her public safety strategy ... is moving the city in the right direction," said the spokesman, Anthony McCarthy. "She hopes that the action today by the council is an indicator that people are going to give her strategy a chance."

Baltimore is employing a somewhat similar strategy, called Operation Protect, in which the city barricades individual neighborhoods and floods them with police and city services. Two neighborhoods, one in Park Heights and the other near McElderry Park, are taking part in the program now, and Dixon has vowed to establish two more.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/ ... &cset=true

Post Reply