
looney wrote:1. John mccain is like george bush
2. john mccain is to old to run for president 70 plus yrs
3. obama won all 3 debates thats the deciding factor







AllhoodPublications wrote:Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the silly acting hockey mom that sabotaged mccains campaign- what was mccain thinking...

61deuce wrote:AllhoodPublications wrote:Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the silly acting hockey mom that sabotaged mccains campaign- what was mccain thinking...
Maybe he thought she was HOT-LOOKING and could pull in some middle-age and older men votes LoL


StoneGreaser wrote:First and foremost, he won because he's partially Black.
Secondly, he won because so many people have been brainwashed into thinking that he would do something for them.
Lastly, he won because so many little whiggers are afraid of being seen as somehow racist for voting against him.



StillNoScript wrote:StoneGreaser wrote:First and foremost, he won because he's partially Black.
There were two other black candidates on the ballot. Cynthia McKinney (Green Party) and Alan Keyes (Independent). If people were just voting for the black candidate, why didn't they do better? Al Sharpton ran in '04. Where was the black vote for him?
Secondly, he won because so many people have been brainwashed into thinking that he would do something for them.
That's why people vote. Every single person who's ever cast a vote in the history of democracy cast their vote believing the candidate would serve their best interests.
Lastly, he won because so many little whiggers are afraid of being seen as somehow racist for voting against him.
Yeh, because everyone's vote was going to be made public...
I know you're angry about all of this but you're really reaching for excuses.

StoneGreaser wrote: Hey-if y'all are misguided enough to elect a Chicago politician of ANY color to the presidency, you deserve whatever you get! I really do hope he can do some good for the country, but I believe he's just another cheap thief like all the rest of his gang.

AllhoodPublications wrote:StoneGreaser wrote: Hey-if y'all are misguided enough to elect a Chicago politician of ANY color to the presidency, you deserve whatever you get! I really do hope he can do some good for the country, but I believe he's just another cheap thief like all the rest of his gang.
Kudos to everyone who voted for George Bush, not once but TWICE.
We are really rolling now <sarcasm>.





AllhoodPublications wrote:I feel ya, thats American politricks at its best.
As for cirticizing the President, thats always fair game. It's just sooooo "un-American" <sarcasm>
You know white Republicans and bigots sound to us, what welfare recipients and the Al Sharptons sound to them now. The bickering is already getting old and tired.
While we finally get to see how obnoxious all the complaining is, you (not you persay) equally look like a bunch of complaining bastards who can't accept the fact that a democrat, a 'black' one at that is the President of the United States.

StoneGreaser wrote:Two other Black candidates? I wouldn't hardly call either Cynthia McKinney or (unfortunately) Alan Keyes viable candidates. There are ALWAYS whack candidates 9just like Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson) of many colors who don't stand a chance. This was the first time a Black stood a real chance of making it.
Not true. I would bet that more than a few people voted against the republicans as much as they voted for Obama.
When you run out of arguments, use sarcasm. A true leftist tactic. Not that anyone's vote is made public, but anyone, at least around here, that claimed against him was immediately labelled racist.





StoneGreaser wrote:Little touchy there, eh?
The likelihood of a candidates success is extremely relavant to whether or not people vote for them. Cynthia McKinney is a joke, Al Sharpton not much better-of course they didn't get much support. If you can't understand that, maybe you should learn something about politics.
Just as a note, the "Bro's before Ho's" theme was taken from tee-shirts I saw a group of young Black gentlemens wearing in LAX during the primary season.
I never said "Black people just vote Black".
Truly, I would be amazed by a Black voting for anyone BUT Obama in this last election. Were I Black, the chance to support a viable Black candidate would supercede all else. I would, in fact, look at a Black voting otherwise as a race-traitor. In the words of Eugene Pincham, "Anybody south of Madison Street who doesn't support Harold Washington for re-election should be hung."
My belief, based on conversations and observations,
is that many White liberal types voted for Obama not just to avoid appearing racist to others, but because they felt themselves that it would be racist not to.
As far as how many reasons there were for his success, who knows? No way you can boik it down to a handful.

IronManCash10 wrote:Obama won because hes a great salesman.

StillNoScript wrote:StoneGreaser wrote:Little touchy there, eh?
Oh, this game now, huh? You get owned in a discussion you had no business being in to begin with, and now you're going to accuse me of being too harsh on you? Like I said, learn something about politics, then try and argue them.The likelihood of a candidates success is extremely relavant to whether or not people vote for them. Cynthia McKinney is a joke, Al Sharpton not much better-of course they didn't get much support. If you can't understand that, maybe you should learn something about politics.
Again, beside the point. You said that black people voted for Obama because he was black. You gave no clarification. Just said that black people voted black. If that were true, Sharpton would have done better.Just as a note, the "Bro's before Ho's" theme was taken from tee-shirts I saw a group of young Black gentlemens wearing in LAX during the primary season.
LOL. Nothing worse than going to the "I saw these people doing this and that" resource. Sure. Or, your sisters's room mates, cousin's best friend told you....I never said "Black people just vote Black".
Yes, you did, actually. I would be embarrassed to admit it, too, because it's the comment of yours which revealed you know nothing about racial effects on politics. I knew I was arguing with an amateur from that point on.Truly, I would be amazed by a Black voting for anyone BUT Obama in this last election. Were I Black, the chance to support a viable Black candidate would supercede all else. I would, in fact, look at a Black voting otherwise as a race-traitor. In the words of Eugene Pincham, "Anybody south of Madison Street who doesn't support Harold Washington for re-election should be hung."
So, because you're a racist, black people must be, too? How sad, that you go through life thinking this way.My belief, based on conversations and observations,
LOL,. Here we go, More solid resources....is that many White liberal types voted for Obama not just to avoid appearing racist to others, but because they felt themselves that it would be racist not to.
Again, NOT WHAT YOU SAID the first time. I love how you're backing out and trying to basically re express your dumb ass opinion to make it seem smarter now. Too late. You said white people voted for Obama because they didn't want to appear racist. It hurt me to do it, but I had to school you on the simple fact that nobody's votes are made public in this country, so it is therefore impossible for anyone to vote for a candidate based upon what other people might think of them. In fact, people are more inclined to such a thing when voting conservative, considering the common belief that the eye in the sky watching us all is operated by right wing forces. But I doubt too many people even do that. Voting is one of the few private things in our society. So your point (that you're wisely backing out of now) that whites voted for Obama so that they wouldn't appear racist is just asinine.As far as how many reasons there were for his success, who knows? No way you can boik it down to a handful.
So, you're done? Thank god. When I saw that you responded again, I was expecting about 5 more reasons to add on to the 8 you already had. Remember, you started with 4. You'll be coming up with nonsensical reasons for Obama's victory, desperately denying the fact that he won because he was simply the better candidate, for probably the next 4 years, where you'll then drum up some equally dumb rationalizations for him being reelected.

StoneGreaser wrote:For the rest, it's libidness as usual....I'm right cause I say so, you're wrong, cause I say so, and oh yeah-of course-I'm a racist.

StillNoScript wrote:The wardrobe the RNC spent thousands on to make Palin look like a kick azz professional woman as opposed to the igloo trash she really is had nothing to do with salesmanship...

Return to Conspiracy Theories, Politics & Other Random Topics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests