The average IQ of a Sub-Saharan African hovers somewhere around the low 60's, to the mid 70's. In contrast, the average IQ of a White European is around 99/100. In many European-based countries- meaning Canada, the US, Australia, included with Europe- someone with an IQ of 65/70 would be considered mildly to moderately mentally retarded(using the Binet testing standard).
Such people, in a European/North American- Read as "White"- society, would be considered unfit to perform many common activities, be it the simple task of clothing themselves, or the much more complicated ability to live self-sufficiently. Often, people with IQ in the range mentioned above, would be required to live with the assistance of a relative in order to ensure that they can survive(for lack of a better term).
And yet, Sub-Saharan Africans have managed to etch out a fairly decent lifestyle- Of course, I mean the ability to survive without reliance of a person of higher IQ, not that S/S African living conditions or societies are decent.- in a far harsher environment than the countries mentioned above. By living independently, I mean the ability to provide food, shelter, clothing, etc- the requirements of life, without the assistance of a "helping hand".
My question is; Why do you think that the average, or even above average Sub Saharan African's have managed to thrive- and I use this word liberally- whereas people of the same IQ range in North America/Europe have not?













