article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

These concepts are socially constructed and have been given much weight. What are your thoughts?

article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby ajonesballalala » February 20th, 2010, 2:52 am

I haven't posted in a while, been busy, but this article I ran across recently of black and brown tensions, "startled" me. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/220107mexicangangs.htm

Now, I know all about the racial tensions between black and brown in LA, or west coast, but further down the article about la raza, or someone talking about racial cleansing blacks AND whites in the south, deep south, surprised the hell out of me. I'm talking about the southeast U.S.
Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, etc.

I was shocked, because I thought to myself, damn, they really ON some major ish-t to even consider that, seeing that there are hardly any mexicans down here. I'm currently in the south now as I type this, so I know from firsthand experience, that there are very few mexicans in the "deep" south. Also, the VERY FEW mexicans that I run across down here are very kind, humble, and good people. Not saying that, if they had numbers down here, there wouldn't be any trouble, but from my few experiences with them down here, they stay to themselves.

Also, I knew of the problems on the west coast, especially LA, of blacks and browns, but when I ran into forum discussions on other sites, about this topic, and read recent articles, about this "supposed" new theory to "cleanse" blacks AND whites down south, I was shocked. The same article, I posted, I visited the comments section, to see views and opinions on the situation, and some of the comments, although somewhat surprising, gave me new light into the situation.

Here are some of the comments:
Fianlly, where taking over this country once and for all. And you all get mad for a death of a little girl? How many blacks and white have incest with there children? Then sometimes kill them afterwards? The majority of rapist in this country is white people. Blacks will be slaves again, and whites will be EXTERMINATED!

VIVA LA RAZA!
VIVA AZTLAN!


This surprised the HELL out of me, not saying that all mexicans/hispanics, think like this, but the last part. I know it's from a commenter, who's just trying to stir up something, but mind you the article, itself and others, I've read recently advocated the "cleansing" of blacks AND whites in the "deep" south.

Here's another comment from the section:
well, all I got to say is there's gonna be alot of dead mexicans when the shootin' starts in the south, we all new the majority of the californians are leftist leaning gun hatin' faggots... I have a suggestion, if la raza really thinks they have what it takes to finish off the white and black race then come to the southeast and lets get it on...


Now, this comment had me thinking about whites down here in the "deep" south, that is still traditionally majority white. In the traditionally "deep" south, from my experience, whites are different from whites in LA, or California. You have A LOT of whites down here that would fit into the "hill billy" shotgun carrying stereotype, that aren't intimidated by anyone. These aren't your run of the mill "white collar" types. I've seen with my own eyes these types give "hardcore" thugs a run for their money. I also found this comment interesting, because down here a lot of people have been watching what's going on out west, and I hear a lot of whites through conversation, and also forums such as this, say this same sentiment about La Raza, or whoever, coming down south to start a "cleansing" of blacks and whites.

Personally, I think since California and Texas is right next door to Mexico, and with the influx of Mexicans jumping the border, or whatever the reason, I think that SOME Mexicans, have began to feel themselves a bit, with this attitude towards blacks and whites now, from my understanding, in those states. As the saying goes "Location, Location, Location." Latinos/Hispanics outside the west, southeast, mid west, and east coast, from my experiences with them in these areas, haven't lashed out at blacks and whites, like say in California and Texas.

I've been reading threads and posts about this topic now, for awhile, especially here on this site. I've been telling people down here, about what's going on out west, and blacks down here, didn't want to believe me at first, but a relative of mine and I were watching George Lopez special one night on HBO. I was flipping the channels and tuned in on his stand-up special on HBO, and what he said kind of surprised me.

I've always thought George Lopez to be a very talented and funny comedian, but he said something in a context that made me cringe. He came out at the start of the special, and started playing the American anthem, but stopped it, and played Mexico's anthem, or some other Mexican influenced music over it, and said that they would have to change the American anthem, because "we're taking over" as he states. Now mind you that this is a PREDOMINATELY Latino/Hispanic audience, so everyone in the crowd started cheering.

Now I have no problem with ethnic pride in one's culture, but he goes on to say that "we're taking ALL this over, It's OUR TIME, we're coming." Now I know it may not sound like much, but you have to see the special to sense the racial undertone, it had in its context. Anyway he went on to say a couple more things about how Mexicans, were coming into California and Texas, and had numbers now, it just made me cringe of the racial undertone I sensed from him and the audience in attendance at the special. It's like he really wanted to say something racial, but was sending subliminal messages to others out there.

It just made me cringe, because I used to watch the George Lopez show, and seen him in interviews and things as such, and have never sensed this racial undertone from him, until this special and in front of a large Latino/Hispanic audience.

I'm not suggesting that ALL Latino/Hispanics feel this way, just that someone of that stature, who in interviews, or in front of the camera for whatever, never seemed to have this undertone in him, until he came out in front a large Latino audience, just made me wonder about things. My relative noticed it to, from the audience reaction, and was surprised, because he didn't know, as a lot of others are opening their eyes now, that Hispanics in general, NOT ALL, felt the need to "take things over."

As I've said before, people down here are starting to take notice of the situation out west, and just waiting to see what happens next.

Thanks for your reading time

PEACE
ajonesballalala
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: September 5th, 2009, 1:14 pm
What city do you live in now?: Inglewood

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby H572DSTA » February 20th, 2010, 5:43 am

i got the feelin that itz gettin worse every day.

last time i had to took the bus 2 compton cause my car was stolen a group of mexican youngsters called me a "tinto"

when i was young and we blacks was deeper in compton i cant remember that we ever did something racial 2 them

itz them younger ones who think that we blacks are a inferior race or smt

i love compton and it hurts to see my city changes from a multy-ethnic to lil mexico
H572DSTA
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
 
Posts: 750
Joined: December 28th, 2007, 5:57 pm
Location: ES Compton Parkside

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby whiskeyjack » February 20th, 2010, 7:16 am

thats fucking sad, Im one of those HillBilly types and i have this really bad feeling if i lived in california or texas i would have already shot someone... Its sad people act like this. The chinesse and Paki's come to my country in boat loads, but nowhere have a i heard they wanted to exterminate us. IVE NOTICED that Racist blacks and racist whites have alot of common ground when dealing with immigrants but hate each other too much to do anything about it as one. Which in my opinion would do something about it
whiskeyjack
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 1018
Joined: September 6th, 2007, 8:17 pm
Location: Everywhere in Canada

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby ajonesballalala » February 20th, 2010, 7:35 am

It's ironic that you mentioned that about Compton, because I just ran across an article on the Highland Park, murders of innocent civilians blacks. In the article, a high ranking official of LAPD, said that he thinks blacks AND whites would have to leave LA. I remembered reading threads and posts here on this site, on this topic, and someone stating how only the biggest and strongest hoods in South Central would survive.

At the time, I didn't pay it no mind, but your statement, and the article, I'll post soon, brought that statement to mind for me. I'm from Inglewood, but I'm in the "deep" south right now, but back on the west coast, in Inglewood, I rarely had beefs with Mexicans, seriously. I believe there are many factors to that, 1) The families had the "I" on lock, 2) I honestly believed that the Mexicans in Inglewood, didn't want to start on that racial BS, because the families and the 60's of Hyde park above us, was in somewhat of close proximity to each other, and banged on one another hard. So the Mexicans in Inglewood, didn't want the Families and 60's to turn their notorious hard banging on one another, and attack those Mexicans in the area.

But, yeah, that article I came across about SOME Mexicans so called "theory" of "cleansing" blacks and whites in the "deep" south surprised the hell out of me. As I've stated, there's VERY FEW Mexicans down here, and the very few down here, stay to themselves and are humble individuals. Also the "deep" south is still majority white, and as I've stated, whites down here are different from California whites. Again, these aren't your run of the mill "white collar" whites, as I've stated I've seen these so called "hill billy" shotgun carrying whites give the average "hardcore" thug a real run for their money, so be careful.

Picture the move "The Devil's Rejects", not to be derogatory, or funny, but put it this way, A LOT of Whites down here don't play, and LOVE their guns. I know this from first hand experience, as I posted the commenter post above. Blacks AND whites down here have been taking notice of the situation out west, and a lot whites, I've had conversations with, and I've noticed on forums, are somewhat "shotgun" ready, for this so called "cleansing" of blacks and whites in the "deep" south.

Again, people are opening their eyes to what's happening out west, so be careful.

Thanks for your reading time

PEACE
ajonesballalala
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: September 5th, 2009, 1:14 pm
What city do you live in now?: Inglewood

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby ajonesballalala » February 21st, 2010, 10:28 am

Here's the article of a LAPD probation officer comments, on the ethnic "cleansing" of blacks in LA.
http://www.alternet.org/story/46855/

Now, I'm fully aware of what's going on between black and brown out west, particular LA, but the probation officer's comments "startled" me:
"I don't see much history left for blacks in Los Angeles,"
says LAPD probation officer James Lewis, who is himself black and deals specifically with Latino gang members in northeast Los Angeles, including the Avenues.
"It plays out not just with the gang members, but also the way things are going [for blacks] throughout Los Angeles."


Another statement made in the article, I'm quite sure by now, most, if not everyone, knows this:
Since 1990, the African-American population of Los Angeles has dropped by half as blacks relocated to suburbs, and Latinos have moved into historically black neighborhoods. Traversing South Central L.A. today, it's obvious that the urban landscape has changed radically since the Bloods-versus-Crips era depicted in movies like Colors, Boyz N The Hood, and Menace II Society. Not only are there vastly fewer black people walking the streets, there are vastly fewer obvious black gang members. Beige skin and baggy khakis have displaced the red and blue bandannas of the Bloods and the Crips.


Most Los Angelinos have noticed this by now, particularly the east side of South Central LA.
Also, I mentioned La Raza, or whoever, so called theory towards whites as well. Well I was browsing forums on this topic, and a commenter wanted everyone to know of the white victims as well. There was an incident in Texas involving a white girl, but I'll have to find that article.

I haven't really noticed much media coverage of the violence against whites as blacks, but I'll keep an ear out. Sad to see it has come to this, but I RESPECT those Mexicans/Hispanics speaking out against La Raza, or whoever, they want to be. I also condemn those blacks who go out to intentionally harm, or worse, kill innocent Mexicans, because of their race. I'm somewhat SHOCKED that it has gotten to this point, but I'm prayerful that something will be done to stop this madness.

It was sad when blacks was killing blacks, because of gang banging, as well as Mexicans/Hispanics killing each other, off of gang banging. Now innocent blacks and Mexicans/Hispanics who live in these environments have to worry about catching a bullet, because of their race, sad. What's even sadder, is that, these two minorities, historically known for being discriminated against, is having to worry about being harmed, or possibly killed by those they helped and fought for to gain rights, not by those who was known for the discriminating.

I'm just sad, to see this happen, but prayerful something happens to wake some people up.

Thanks for your reading time

PEACE
ajonesballalala
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: September 5th, 2009, 1:14 pm
What city do you live in now?: Inglewood

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby perongregory » February 21st, 2010, 5:46 pm

I don't know but mexicans just trippin with this racial shit, but trust me if they touch white people they gettin that ass taxed...white people don't play that foolishness.
perongregory
Super Heavy Weight
Super Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 5146
Joined: February 12th, 2004, 9:17 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby ajonesballalala » February 22nd, 2010, 5:32 am

I don't know but mexicans just trippin with this racial shit, but trust me if they touch white people they gettin that ass taxed...white people don't play that foolishness.


That's what surprised me, because I've known of, SOME Mexicans, hostilities towards blacks, but I'm hearing also towards whites now. That's what somewhat surprised me, because as I've stated, personally, I haven't heard stories of violence towards whites. I'm just sad to see it come to this, but hopefully something plays out peacefully.

Thanks

PEACE
ajonesballalala
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: September 5th, 2009, 1:14 pm
What city do you live in now?: Inglewood

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby mayugastank » February 23rd, 2010, 4:31 am

perongregory wrote:I don't know but mexicans just trippin with this racial shit, but trust me if they touch white people they gettin that ass taxed...white people don't play that foolishness.




Really? 70 white people are killed every month by illegal immigrants......
mayugastank
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 1708
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 9:41 pm
Country: United States
If in the United States: Arkansas
What city do you live in now?: Whittier

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby ajonesballalala » February 23rd, 2010, 10:52 am

As far as illegal immigrants killing whites, that's sad and unfortunate. But most of your racist Mexican/Hispanics, are American born citizens, or have citizenship here in the U.S. Majority of those Mexican gang members, who happen to be racist, are American citizens. That's what I believe most people are inferring to, the Mexican gang bangers, who are targeting blacks for violence.
ajonesballalala
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: September 5th, 2009, 1:14 pm
What city do you live in now?: Inglewood

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby perongregory » February 23rd, 2010, 1:05 pm

mayugastank wrote:
perongregory wrote:I don't know but mexicans just trippin with this racial shit, but trust me if they touch white people they gettin that ass taxed...white people don't play that foolishness.




Really? 70 white people are killed every month by illegal immigrants......


Mayuga be serious...you think whites are going to allow chicanos - not mexican nationals who are able to slip around, to really do harm to their kind, you think what happened in the florence and firestone area would happen in pasa, or glendalean or any other pretty wealthy white area with chicano gangs in the city or near?
perongregory
Super Heavy Weight
Super Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 5146
Joined: February 12th, 2004, 9:17 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby ajonesballalala » February 23rd, 2010, 8:19 pm

Interesting point, you have there. IMO, some Mexicans hostilities towards blacks, are more "in reach", seeing how they're sharing the same area, or in some instances streets with one another.
But yeah, I believe as well, that if some of those racist Mexican gang bangers, would cross over into white areas with a so called "cleansing" of whites, authorities, also with the public's outcry, would be considered, more harsher.

Personally, I honestly think, that those Mexicans, with hate towards blacks, know better than to intentionally go into predominantly white areas, looking to inflict random acts of violence. That's my opinion, which is why I'll be somewhat surprised to see that, if it happens, or if it has already occurred.
ajonesballalala
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: September 5th, 2009, 1:14 pm
What city do you live in now?: Inglewood

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby mayugastank » February 23rd, 2010, 11:30 pm

ajonesballalala wrote:Interesting point, you have there. IMO, some Mexicans hostilities towards blacks, are more "in reach", seeing how they're sharing the same area, or in some instances streets with one another.
But yeah, I believe as well, that if some of those racist Mexican gang bangers, would cross over into white areas with a so called "cleansing" of whites, authorities, also with the public's outcry, would be considered, more harsher.

Personally, I honestly think, that those Mexicans, with hate towards blacks, know better than to intentionally go into predominantly white areas, looking to inflict random acts of violence. That's my opinion, which is why I'll be somewhat surprised to see that, if it happens, or if it has already occurred.




GIve me a break! Random acts of racial aggression are committed everyday against whites by both blacks and mexicans, in fact I read that almost 30% of all hate crimes are blacks committing racial violence against whites** Random whites are slaughtered in robbery attempts throughout the year in numbers . They are targeted because either blacks view them as possibly having money or simply for being white. Mexicans do just as much. Like I said 70 muders a month are committed by illegal aliens against white americans. Now you can point to the firestone area as a sampling of racial aggression but the truth is these were 2 gangs going at it -soldiers on both sides doing the killings. Are their even white gangs whom blacks and latinos can do battle against outside of a few in the Antelope VAlley? NO! therefore racial aggression is not met with racial aggression. Will a hispanic gang who randomly shoots a white EVER be targeted by whites for a reprisal shooting ? Doubtful. The numbers seem outlandish because they are coming from 2 sides. Black blasting back and brown blasting back. The only white force
mayugastank
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 1708
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 9:41 pm
Country: United States
If in the United States: Arkansas
What city do you live in now?: Whittier

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby mayugastank » February 23rd, 2010, 11:34 pm

chicanos have to worry about is the police. And now their are more then enough hispanics and blacks on the force to prevent a random Rodney King beatdown or an Amadou Diallo situation. Fuck a white -you guys make them seem all powerful like they will just get off and do a payback for every white killed. The Arabs have put a hurt on a white duck and continue to do so. Whites have no racial unity-they sell eachother down stream for fun or just so you dont beat their ass. The only tough white is a white with 50 cops behind him.
mayugastank
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 1708
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 9:41 pm
Country: United States
If in the United States: Arkansas
What city do you live in now?: Whittier

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby mayugastank » February 23rd, 2010, 11:38 pm

In June 7, 1998, white supremacists hitched James Byrd of Jasper, Texas, to the back of a truck, and dragged him to death. This appalling crime reminded the country in the most forceful way that racial hostility and interracial crime continue to be serious problems in the United States. The resulting national outcry demonstrated how deeply Americans feel about racial violence. Outrage over acts of this kind is entirely appropriate. However, to concentrate on one crime, no matter how sickening, is to present a distorted picture of interracial crime. If we are to respond appropriately to the problem of racial violence it is important to know its true nature and proportions.

Most Americans probably believe that whites commit most interracial crimes, and that blacks are the most frequent victims. The reverse is true: In approximately 90 percent of the interracial crimes of violence involving blacks and whites, blacks are perpetrators and whites are victims. In terms of crime rates (calculated as the number of crimes per 100,000 population), blacks are more than 50 times more likely to attack whites than the reverse. To use the common short-hand expression, interracial crime is overwhelmingly "black-on-white." Because statistics of this kind are surprising to most people, it is worth explaining them in some detail.

Every year since 1972, the U.S. Department of Justice has carried out what is called the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) to determine the frequency of certain kinds of crimes. The NCVS survey sample is very large--approximately 100,000 people in some 50,000 households--and is carefully selected on the basis of census data to make it as representative as possible of the nation as a whole. The NCVS is an invaluable record of criminal victimization as reported directly by Americans, and it is the only significant nationwide measure of interracial crime.

The first page, Table 42, lists various categories of single-offender interracial violent crimes for 1994 (the NCVS is carried out annually, but the Department of Justice does not issue full reports every year; 1994 is the most recent year for this data).

The group of numbers at the top of the page represents totals calculated for single-offender violent crimes reported for that year. They are extrapolated from the actual crimes reported by the survey sample. We find that in 1994; 6,830,360 whites were victims of violent crimes, and that 16.7 percent (1,140,670) reported that the perpetrator was black. Blacks were victims of 1,100,490 violent crimes, of which 12.3 percent (135,360) were committed by whites. Adding these figures for interracial crime together (1,140,670 and 135,360) we get a total of 1,276,030 interracial crimes, of which 1,140,670 or 89 percent were committed by blacks.

To get the rates at which blacks and whites commit interracial crime we divide the number of crimes by the population to get crimes per 100,000 population. The Census Bureau reports that the 1994 white and black populations were 216,413,000 and 32,653,000 respectively. Whites therefore committed acts of interracial violence at a rate of 62.55 per 100,000 while the black rate was 3,493.63 per 100,000, a figure that is no less than 55.85 times the white rate. Put in the most easily understood terms, the average black was therefore 56 times more likely to commit criminal violence against a white than was a white to commit criminal violence against a black. Similar calculations show that the black rate for interracial robbery, or "mugging," was 103 times the white rate. These two rates are illustrated in the graph on the next page, and it is important to understand what these figures mean. The multiple of 56 does not mean that blacks commit 56 times as much interracial violence as whites. What it means is that if whites commit interracial violence at a rate of 10 crimes per 100,000 whites, the rate for blacks is 560 per 100,000, or 56 times the white rate. This is the kind of calculation that is represented in most of the graphs in this report.

The figures from Table 42 of the NCVS show other facts about interracial violence. If we once again concentrate on the group of figures at the top of the table we can calculate the total number of crimes committed by perpetrators of each race, and the percentage that is committed against the other race. We find that the 1,140,670 acts of violence committed by blacks against whites constitute 56.3 percent of all violent crimes committed by blacks. That is to say that when blacks commit violent crimes they target whites more than half the time or, put differently, there is more black-on-white than black-on-black crime. Similar calculations for whites show that of the 5,114,692 acts of criminal violence committed by whites, only 2.6 percent were directed at blacks. (Although homicide is a violent crime, the NCVS does not include it because victims cannot be interviewed. The number of interracial murders is small and does not affect the percentages and ratios presented here.)

Some may argue that blacks commit violence against whites because whites are more likely to have money and are therefore more promising robbery targets. However, of the 1,140,670 black-on-white acts of violence reported in 1994, only 173,374 were robberies. The remaining 84.8 percent were aggravated assaults, rapes, and simple assaults, which presumably were not motivated by profit. Rape, in particular, has nothing to do with the presumed wealth of the victim. More than 30,000 white women were raped by black men in 1994, and about 5,400 black women were raped by white men. The black interracial rape rate was 38 times the white rate.

The second page of Appendix A of this report is another page from the NCVS. Table 48 shows interracial crime data for acts of violence committed by multiple offenders. By doing the same calculations as before, we can determine how much group or "gang" violence (not in the sense of organized gangs) is interracial, and how much is committed by blacks and by whites. Of the total of 490,266 acts of multiple-offender interracial violence, no fewer than 93.9 percent were committed by blacks against whites. Robbery, for which there is a monetary motive, accounted for fewer than one third of these crimes. The rest were gang assaults, including rapes, presumably for motives other than profit.

Rates of group violence for each race can be calculated as before, and the difference between the races is stark. The black rate of overall interracial gang violence is 101.75 times the white rate; for robbery it is 277.31 times the white rate. Differences as great as this are seldom found in comparative studies of group behavior, and they cry out for study and explanation. It is probably safe to say that if the races were reversed, and gangs of whites were attacking blacks at merely four or five times the rate at which blacks were attacking whites the country would consider this a national crisis that required urgent attention
mayugastank
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 1708
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 9:41 pm
Country: United States
If in the United States: Arkansas
What city do you live in now?: Whittier

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby mayugastank » February 23rd, 2010, 11:42 pm

ajonesballalala wrote:Interesting point, you have there. IMO, some Mexicans hostilities towards blacks, are more "in reach", seeing how they're sharing the same area, or in some instances streets with one another.
But yeah, I believe as well, that if some of those racist Mexican gang bangers, would cross over into white areas with a so called "cleansing" of whites, authorities, also with the public's outcry, would be considered, more harsher.

Personally, I honestly think, that those Mexicans, with hate towards blacks, know better than to intentionally go into predominantly white areas, looking to inflict random acts of violence. That's my opinion, which is why I'll be somewhat surprised to see that, if it happens, or if it has already occurred.




Look it dude. Most Mexicans dont give a duck about blacks -we dont sit around and think of ways to do random crimes against them. Most conversations that mexicans have about blacks is racial -but they are rare! its only when a situation has happened that racial discussions are held. Say for instance SHANANAY was rude to a mexican at the DMV -he come home tells his wife about it and they say some racial shit -but they dont go out and plot some murder .....
mayugastank
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 1708
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 9:41 pm
Country: United States
If in the United States: Arkansas
What city do you live in now?: Whittier

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby mayugastank » February 23rd, 2010, 11:47 pm

anyways black love and brown pride I dont like reading up on stuff like this -its fucking stupid. The people who are doing all this shit are freaking losers -has beens convicts and just sorry in 2010 throwing your life away for a brownie point in the pen -sucking some dudes ass who cant spell his own name -of course a fool like that is gonna pop a black -his life is worthless anyway. Did you see the vato that popped JAmiel Shaw ? talk about inbred-dude was crossed eyed and had a haircut like one of the munsterz.....lol
mayugastank
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 1708
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 9:41 pm
Country: United States
If in the United States: Arkansas
What city do you live in now?: Whittier

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby perongregory » February 24th, 2010, 1:00 am

The arabs put a lil hurt on whites cuz they're crazy, but guess how much of a hurt whites have put on the Arabs, and anyone who has interferred with their plans.
perongregory
Super Heavy Weight
Super Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 5146
Joined: February 12th, 2004, 9:17 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby ajonesballalala » February 24th, 2010, 6:06 am

GIve me a break! Random acts of racial aggression are committed everyday against whites by both blacks and mexicans, in fact I read that almost 30% of all hate crimes are blacks committing racial violence against whites** Random whites are slaughtered in robbery attempts throughout the year in numbers . They are targeted because either blacks view them as possibly having money or simply for being white. Mexicans do just as much. Like I said 70 muders a month are committed by illegal aliens against white americans. Now you can point to the firestone area as a sampling of racial aggression but the truth is these were 2 gangs going at it -soldiers on both sides doing the killings. Are their even white gangs whom blacks and latinos can do battle against outside of a few in the Antelope VAlley? NO! therefore racial aggression is not met with racial aggression. Will a hispanic gang who randomly shoots a white EVER be targeted by whites for a reprisal shooting ? Doubtful. The numbers seem outlandish because they are coming from 2 sides. Black blasting back and brown blasting back. The only white force


I know this, but what I was inferring to, was that if SOME of those Mexicans/Hispanic gangs came out and publicly stated that they had a "cleansing" plan against whites,as they have come out and stated against blacks, IMO, I believe that authorities would handle the situation differently, just my opinion.

Also, you say that a Hispanic gang that shoots a white, will be doubtful to receive a reprisal shooting from whites, I disagree somewhat. IMO, there would be a swift and harsh reprisal, in the form a a very long prison sentence, life sentence, or death penalty. Everyone has been targeted by one race or the other, but that wasn't what I was implying, when stating that, IMO, those Mexican/Hispanic gangs wouldn't INTENTIONALLY go out to predominantly white areas, to inflict random acts of violence towards whites. My personal opinion on the situation.
ajonesballalala
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: September 5th, 2009, 1:14 pm
What city do you live in now?: Inglewood

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby ajonesballalala » February 24th, 2010, 6:16 am

Look it dude. Most Mexicans dont give a duck about blacks -we dont sit around and think of ways to do random crimes against them. Most conversations that mexicans have about blacks is racial -but they are rare! its only when a situation has happened that racial discussions are held. Say for instance SHANANAY was rude to a mexican at the DMV -he come home tells his wife about it and they say some racial shit -but they dont go out and plot some murder .....


Again, read my posts, I've always stated SOME Mexican/Hispanic GANG members showed hostilities towards blacks, NOT ALL. I've also condemn those blacks gangs that target and harm, or worse, kill innocent Mexican/Hispanic civilians, because of their race.

Say for instance SHANANAY


Sound ignorant, and racist there. Couldn't come up with a better name, now we're going to stereotypes, that's not my forte. Again, I'm just prayerful that something happens on all sides, so this conflict can come to a peaceful solution.
ajonesballalala
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: September 5th, 2009, 1:14 pm
What city do you live in now?: Inglewood

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby mayugastank » February 24th, 2010, 9:12 pm

HERES WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN TO END THE RACIAL BS....you take all those cornroll having -pick in the hair ,ass showing ,low pants wearing ,bloodshot eyes ,gold teeth ,ghetto trash ,black gangstas and you stick them with those immigrant -non chicano wannabe ,joker jersey wearing ,crosseyed, 2 foot tall ,monkey looking, little pony tail having gangster mexicans ......you take both these monkey fux and put them in a big ass room and tie them up to eachother in pairs, one black one mexican and you let these dirty fucks chew eachother till they die. Then all of us nongangbanging civilians will be left in peace and all the ghetto trash can die a horrible death --in the manner of Kaityn Avila and Cheryl Greene.
mayugastank
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 1708
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 9:41 pm
Country: United States
If in the United States: Arkansas
What city do you live in now?: Whittier

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby whiskeyjack » February 24th, 2010, 11:52 pm

if the apaches, delta force and A-10s were stationed in mexico instead of the middle east mexicans would have a different opinion.... lucky is all i have to say
whiskeyjack
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
 
Posts: 1018
Joined: September 6th, 2007, 8:17 pm
Location: Everywhere in Canada

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby ajonesballalala » February 25th, 2010, 12:10 am

HERES WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN TO END THE RACIAL BS....you take all those cornroll having -pick in the hair ,ass showing ,low pants wearing ,bloodshot eyes ,gold teeth ,ghetto trash ,black gangstas and you stick them with those immigrant -non chicano wannabe ,joker jersey wearing ,crosseyed, 2 foot tall ,monkey looking, little pony tail having gangster mexicans ......you take both these monkey fux and put them in a big ass room and tie them up to eachother in pairs, one black one mexican and you let these dirty fucks chew eachother till they die. Then all of us nongangbanging civilians will be left in peace and all the ghetto trash can die a horrible death --in the manner of Kaityn Avila and Cheryl Greene.


Again, stereotypes, not my forte. Also, your theory of letting black and Mexican gang bangers, kill each other in prison, wouldn't work, imo. Considering that Mexican gang members outnumber black gang members, so the Mexican gangs would have the upper hand. Also with all the Mexican gang bangers in prison, imo, La Eme, would have a very strong hand in running the prisons, which they already do. But for every gang banger in prison, there are new ones ready to fill the void in those communities, so the problem is deeper, than your proposed theory.
ajonesballalala
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: September 5th, 2009, 1:14 pm
What city do you live in now?: Inglewood

Re: article shocked me about "proposed" theory down south

Postby ajonesballalala » February 25th, 2010, 12:18 am

if the apaches, delta force and A-10s were stationed in mexico instead of the middle east mexicans would have a different opinion.... lucky is all i have to say


I agree, somewhat, that if the borders were stationed as you say, that it would be much difficult to infiltrate the U.S. Also I remember watching "Gangland" on the History Channel, and a MS-13 member explaining how easy it was to commit a crime in his native El Salvador, and infiltrate the U.S. to escape heat and vice versa. Interesting point, nonetheless. Also, I mention again that most illegal immigrants aren't gang members to begin with, and are just trying to escape to make a better way of life.
ajonesballalala
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: September 5th, 2009, 1:14 pm
What city do you live in now?: Inglewood


Return to Race and Ethnicity, Racial Relations & Racism



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests