
MMRbkaRudog wrote:mayugastank wrote:ONE OF AMERICAS OLDEST GANGS
TEMPLE STREET a filipino gang should be added to the list. 1920 or earlier. Notice how when anyone mentions the zootsuit it always mentions blacks-filipinos and mexicans...is it a wonder why? The Filipino gang is one of the oldest in the nation. The gang is active in the phillipines to date, I have heard that pinoys were thorough 100% involved in the beginings of modern gang culture. To think that although small in number they have formed something so thorough-theyve always in my book been real original. The flips in Montebello, old school ones and even new ones dont try pretending to be mexican or dress like us or do anything like us, so next time you see a gangster flip know that they were their with their input since the 1920s probably earlier!. I see them in that pic and give a hat off to a people whove been original from the gate and were around for what modern street culture is today.
Yeah, but blacks do right?


Rudog wrote:Stank - It wasn't really a question. It was a joke, just like you. We already been over what I believe with blacks & what you do, so it's no need to bring it up all over again.

mayugastank wrote:Rudog wrote:Stank - It wasn't really a question. It was a joke, just like you. We already been over what I believe with blacks & what you do, so it's no need to bring it up all over again.
The question is RUDOG- do blacks dispute that mexicans are the originators of MODERN GANG CULTURE?
their arent a black gang in America with HALF the history of the youngest gangs in East Los Angelos. From the tatts to the form of dress to the graffiti to the rags and colors.......
Lets not pretend: outside of Los Angelos-they are not one single black gang remotely similiair to the crips/bloods and the only reason they are so different is because theyve adopted completely the style of the cholo. Not in New York ( 3 million blacks) not in the South (27 million blacks) are their dickie banging-red wearing-tatted like a cholo African Americans......
Bit their are dickie banging inked up chicanos lowriding in ALL THE STATES chicanos live. In fact in El PAso, Texas and in San Antonio, Texas one can find the begining of modern gang culture. Cholo style. Inked in and representing, they are also way older then gangs in EAST LOS ANGELOS> most chicano hoods from Los Angelos had as tehir originators chicanos from Texas.



mayugastank wrote:Temple Street originally Mexican? SOURCES.
Ive always heard that they are mexican NOW. But were originally flip.


Silencioso wrote:mayugastank wrote:Temple Street originally Mexican? SOURCES.
Ive always heard that they are mexican NOW. But were originally flip.
LA Times 1953. Temple is mentioned as a predominantly Mexican gang with some "Anglos" and "Negros".


mayugastank wrote:their is no denying that Filipino gangs in Los Angelos were here from the beginings. Santanas is said to be 100 years old. If we include any gangs in "oldest gangs" they definetly have their spot.
Temple Street as I was told was pure Filipino. It then turned Mexican, they are one of Los Angelos' oldest gangs. The papers list the zootsuit as a style of clothing worn by Filipinos-Mexican and Blacks.
Is it a wonder why? we got Temple Street and probably many more pinoy gangs who were very active and very into the gang culture as far back as the 1920s

mayugastank wrote:ONE OF AMERICAS OLDEST GANGS
TEMPLE STREET a filipino gang should be added to the list. 1920 or earlier. Notice how when anyone mentions the zootsuit it always mentions blacks-filipinos and mexicans...is it a wonder why? The Filipino gang is one of the oldest in the nation. The gang is active in the phillipines to date, I have heard that pinoys were thorough 100% involved in the beginings of modern gang culture. To think that although small in number they have formed something so thorough-theyve always in my book been real original. The flips in Montebello, old school ones and even new ones dont try pretending to be mexican or dress like us or do anything like us, so next time you see a gangster flip know that they were their with their input since the 1920s probably earlier!. I see them in that pic and give a hat off to a people whove been original from the gate and were around for what modern street culture is today.

MCD wrote:Silencioso wrote:mayugastank wrote:Temple Street originally Mexican? SOURCES.
Ive always heard that they are mexican NOW. But were originally flip.
LA Times 1953. Temple is mentioned as a predominantly Mexican gang with some "Anglos" and "Negros".
I talked to a guy from LA who lived near TST and he told me it was pure filipino, that then mixed with mexicans.
Seeing as how mexicans and filipinos get along, I can see that being the case, besides the papers get shit wrong alot.

mayugastank wrote:their is no denying that Filipino gangs in Los Angelos were here from the beginings. Santanas is said to be 100 years old. If we include any gangs in "oldest gangs" they definetly have their spot.
Temple Street as I was told was pure Filipino. It then turned Mexican, they are one of Los Angelos' oldest gangs. The papers list the zootsuit as a style of clothing worn by Filipinos-Mexican and Blacks.
Is it a wonder why? we got Temple Street and probably many more pinoy gangs who were very active and very into the gang culture as far back as the 1920s

judastaugamma wrote:MCD wrote:Silencioso wrote:mayugastank wrote:Temple Street originally Mexican? SOURCES.
Ive always heard that they are mexican NOW. But were originally flip.
LA Times 1953. Temple is mentioned as a predominantly Mexican gang with some "Anglos" and "Negros".
I talked to a guy from LA who lived near TST and he told me it was pure filipino, that then mixed with mexicans.
Seeing as how mexicans and filipinos get along, I can see that being the case, besides the papers get shit wrong alot.
not true.
from what i read/heard when temple street started out they had some filipinos back in the 20's or whenever but still majority chicano.
but there wasn't many filipinos in los angeles back then yet.
later on more filipino immigrants came and they had their own clique in temple street.
a temple street (mexican) told me the pinoy locos clique is one of their oldest cliques. not sure how true that is though.



perongregory wrote:We've already said this millions of times, white ethnics started gang culture in America including LA, Mexicans came in and added alot but not all of that culture was straight CHicano. White fence and all them old barrios weren't pachucos or cholos and all of that shit in no goddamn 1910's 1920's, the pachuco era is when we started to see the Mexican american gangster really define himself, and the pachuco era was influenced by black stylings from the east coast. The reason Mayugastank isn't taken seriously because he will give phillipinos (a small population) credit, ignore what whiteboys steal and do and have done to Mexicans and then go straight to blacks and try to tear blacks totally down. This is haterish sick behavior. CHicanos influenced the fu-- out of blacks on the west coast, but so have blacks, and so have whites. Chicanos have listened to oldies, rap, funk, dressed in zoot suits, get fades, rappin, talk like blacks drive trucks w 20's and up on em, hip hop tagging, etc. that blacks have brought from east coast and originated here but Mayuga lies and says nah, I doubt that a purto rican did it, a filipino did it. That's BS. hell even famed chicano artist chaz bojorquez said he got the calavera design partly from superfly and other black gangster underworld type looks at the time.
Again, white ethnics started the gangs, chicanos moved in put a whole bunch into it, blacks took it to another level and then started borrowing definitely but from then on blacks and mexicans have been trading culture and that's the real truth.

ViciousRidah wrote:perongregory wrote:We've already said this millions of times, white ethnics started gang culture in America including LA, Mexicans came in and added alot but not all of that culture was straight CHicano. White fence and all them old barrios weren't pachucos or cholos and all of that shit in no goddamn 1910's 1920's, the pachuco era is when we started to see the Mexican american gangster really define himself, and the pachuco era was influenced by black stylings from the east coast. The reason Mayugastank isn't taken seriously because he will give phillipinos (a small population) credit, ignore what whiteboys steal and do and have done to Mexicans and then go straight to blacks and try to tear blacks totally down. This is haterish sick behavior. CHicanos influenced the fu-- out of blacks on the west coast, but so have blacks, and so have whites. Chicanos have listened to oldies, rap, funk, dressed in zoot suits, get fades, rappin, talk like blacks drive trucks w 20's and up on em, hip hop tagging, etc. that blacks have brought from east coast and originated here but Mayuga lies and says nah, I doubt that a purto rican did it, a filipino did it. That's BS. hell even famed chicano artist chaz bojorquez said he got the calavera design partly from superfly and other black gangster underworld type looks at the time.
Again, white ethnics started the gangs, chicanos moved in put a whole bunch into it, blacks took it to another level and then started borrowing definitely but from then on blacks and mexicans have been trading culture and that's the real truth.
I think you guys are having a problem understanding that there was never an en masse migration from the east coast to west coast,only from the South to the West Coast .Plus a lot of the stylings of black culture started in the 1920s in the south from the playas and pimps.




jdm894g wrote:This nicca Mayuga done took his racists rants to another gang forum and spreading his propaganda.

Return to Race and Ethnicity, Racial Relations & Racism
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests