L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

The Midwest for the pupose of this forum will be defined as the following States; Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin
Post Reply
User avatar
Lonewolf
Super Heavy Weight
Super Heavy Weight
Posts: 4167
Joined: June 2nd, 2004, 4:57 pm
Country: Mexico
If in the United States: California
What city do you live in now?: Tijuana
Location: THE BORDERLAND
Contact:

L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by Lonewolf » January 28th, 2005, 8:48 pm

These two cities have the top spots when it comes to style and influence in their gang culture, which is what so many others adopt or hold allegiance of some sort.

Wether they be Folk, People, Blood, Crip, Stones, Sureño or Norteño, Black, Mexican, White, Puerto Rican or what have you.

Which of the two cities have a more diciplined or tighter knit gang culture?

For instance in Rules to follow, artwork, graffitti symbols, social agenda, community relations, and so on.

L.A. or CHICAGO?

Which has the strongest structured gang culture in your opinion and why?

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 28th, 2005, 10:09 pm

chi town,hands down.


1.All chicago gangs have structure,many are organized like countries or buisness.

2.they all have literature and laws that they follow,and must memorize.

3.many chicago based gangs are or have been involved in politics,from the blackstone rangers(now just BPSN) in the 60s,to the CVLs in the 60s/70s,to the GDs and MLDs in the 90s

Rollin_inmy_SixFo
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 556
Joined: January 29th, 2004, 2:49 pm
Location: LA

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by Rollin_inmy_SixFo » January 28th, 2005, 11:35 pm

Chicago are probly more organized. They got hierarchies, rule books, n shit.

LA gangs are more violent, crazy, ruthless, in your face, and don't give a fohk type gangs. Homies are more equal and don't have to answer to anybody.

The styles that you see today though are all from LOS! No question about that.

Outside the West Coast though Chicago got mad influence far as structure goes.

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 29th, 2005, 9:16 am

LA gangs are not ''more violent'' than chicago ones.You have no way to prove that so you shouldnt say it.


Go to englewood,Humbolt park or Pilsen and see just how violent the gangs are in the chi.

1111§
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 378
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 7:41 am

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by 1111§ » January 29th, 2005, 9:49 am

I think this threat is fueling some hatred between persons from the Cgi and people from LA >>> not a good idea...

User avatar
Q
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1229
Joined: January 21st, 2004, 10:44 pm

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by Q » January 29th, 2005, 11:07 am

naw chicago gangs is more of a organization then la gangs.

FLUID
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 455
Joined: March 7th, 2004, 6:27 pm
Location: ROCKTOWN,IL

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by FLUID » January 29th, 2005, 12:20 pm

They both on the same level. Just got some different ways.

Really though, LA is just as organized as Chicago. Maybe LA gangs ain't got the laws & literature and gang leaders but that shit ain't all what it seem in Chicago either. Niggas don't draw off that literature shit that much no more plus all the mob leaders keep catchin federal indictments so it really ain't no leadership on the streets. I wouldn't even want no rank cause of the feds plus it's hard trying to keep a bunch of knuckleheads in check. Niggas start rebellin against their own chiefs and that's how you get all those renegades. Niggas don't wanna follow know laws & rules, especially when you gettin taxed by your own mob.

User avatar
GIBBY
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 705
Joined: August 6th, 2003, 11:11 am

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by GIBBY » January 29th, 2005, 12:32 pm

HaHa...One thing that is undebatable is that Chicago hoods write like shitt. Looks like damn chicken scratch LOL

Rollin_inmy_SixFo
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 556
Joined: January 29th, 2004, 2:49 pm
Location: LA

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by Rollin_inmy_SixFo » January 29th, 2005, 3:00 pm

blackmanofhonor wrote:LA gangs are not ''more violent'' than chicago ones.You have no way to prove that so you shouldnt say it.


Go to englewood,Humbolt park or Pilsen and see just how violent the gangs are in the chi.
It ain't nothing to be proud of. Nobody wins with violence. Besides, you don't have any proof of anything you're saying either.

User avatar
Lonewolf
Super Heavy Weight
Super Heavy Weight
Posts: 4167
Joined: June 2nd, 2004, 4:57 pm
Country: Mexico
If in the United States: California
What city do you live in now?: Tijuana
Location: THE BORDERLAND
Contact:

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by Lonewolf » January 29th, 2005, 5:44 pm

So which of the two cities has more olden gangs still in existance?

Which has a more generational membership line that continues to carry on?

Which has the most influence outside their immediate surroundings?

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 29th, 2005, 7:09 pm

Rollin_inmy_SixFo wrote:
blackmanofhonor wrote:LA gangs are not ''more violent'' than chicago ones.You have no way to prove that so you shouldnt say it.


Go to englewood,Humbolt park or Pilsen and see just how violent the gangs are in the chi.
It ain't nothing to be proud of. Nobody wins with violence. Besides, you don't have any proof of anything you're saying either.
everyone knows humboldt park,englewood and pilsen are violent areas,I dont need any proof.and im not saying its anything to be proud of its just a fact


i dont like when people sugar coat things

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 29th, 2005, 7:13 pm

FLUID wrote:They both on the same level. Just got some different ways.

Really though, LA is just as organized as Chicago. Maybe LA gangs ain't got the laws & literature and gang leaders but that shit ain't all what it seem in Chicago either. Niggas don't draw off that literature shit that much no more...

I dont care what mob you are,if you dont know your literature or least some of it then you are false flagging.Yea niggas get away with more bogus thangs on the streets,but if you go to the joint reppin a mob and you arent plugged,youre going to have problems.

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 29th, 2005, 7:15 pm

and if you go in the joint reppin renegade then you will most def have problems

User avatar
Lonewolf
Super Heavy Weight
Super Heavy Weight
Posts: 4167
Joined: June 2nd, 2004, 4:57 pm
Country: Mexico
If in the United States: California
What city do you live in now?: Tijuana
Location: THE BORDERLAND
Contact:

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by Lonewolf » January 29th, 2005, 9:29 pm

Some have posted here on this site that there is Sureños in Chicago.
What happens when they get locked up and they're not affiliated with any of the locals?

Same for any Bloods or Cuzz, how are they treated?

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 30th, 2005, 10:04 am

not sure.Those Bs and Cs that rep the 5 and 6 would have problems thou.They would probably make em flip to folks or people.

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 30th, 2005, 10:06 am

I have a question....what if a BPS from out here went into the Jungles in cali....how do you think the BPS bloods would treat a member of the original/people BPS?

FLUID
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 455
Joined: March 7th, 2004, 6:27 pm
Location: ROCKTOWN,IL

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by FLUID » January 30th, 2005, 12:58 pm

blackmanofhonor wrote:I have a question....what if a BPS from out here went into the Jungles in cali....how do you think the BPS bloods would treat a member of the original/people BPS?
They gon' treat him with love.

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 30th, 2005, 1:02 pm

what if a BPS Blood from LA went to Moe Town(or any other Stone deck) in chicago?you think they would get love?


as far as the Moes in the Mil,I think some would be understanding of a cali BPS Blood and keep it cool(mostly older and wiser Stones),while other Stones I know would prob kick up drama(younger wilder Stones)


but if the leader of the moes said dont mess with him they would listen

FLUID
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 455
Joined: March 7th, 2004, 6:27 pm
Location: ROCKTOWN,IL

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by FLUID » January 30th, 2005, 1:13 pm

Yeah a LA Stone would get love from a MoeTown or TerrorTown Stone but they gon' test him first, no doubt. A LA Stone most likely gon be tatted up that "BPSB" sign so I think he'll be alright. But then again a LA Stone might have to click up with a renegade Stone deck(Apache, Titanic, Jet Black, etc) cause they draw different like LA Stones.

FLUID
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 455
Joined: March 7th, 2004, 6:27 pm
Location: ROCKTOWN,IL

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by FLUID » January 30th, 2005, 1:26 pm

lonewolf wrote:Some have posted here on this site that there is Sureños in Chicago.
What happens when they get locked up and they're not affiliated with any of the locals?

Same for any Bloods or Cuzz, how are they treated?
It's not even gon' be a click of Crips or Bloods in Illinois prisons so they gon' have to click up with somebody else. I ain't never seen a Blood or Crip in my life. Now it's Surenos in Illinois but they all in the smaller towns like Rockford where I'm at. Maybe a few in the Chi. So the Surs probably got some heads in the Illinois joints but they probably still gotta click up with somebody cause they small over here.

Rollin_inmy_SixFo
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 556
Joined: January 29th, 2004, 2:49 pm
Location: LA

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by Rollin_inmy_SixFo » January 30th, 2005, 1:49 pm

blackmanofhonor wrote:
Rollin_inmy_SixFo wrote:
blackmanofhonor wrote:LA gangs are not ''more violent'' than chicago ones.You have no way to prove that so you shouldnt say it.


Go to englewood,Humbolt park or Pilsen and see just how violent the gangs are in the chi.
It ain't nothing to be proud of. Nobody wins with violence. Besides, you don't have any proof of anything you're saying either.
everyone knows humboldt park,englewood and pilsen are violent areas,I dont need any proof.and im not saying its anything to be proud of its just a fact


i dont like when people sugar coat things
It's all in your mind! I aint never heard of no humbolt park, englewood, an pilsen. Never heard any news stories, no movies, no documentaries, nothing. WHY-IS-THAT??

1111§
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 378
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 7:41 am

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by 1111§ » January 30th, 2005, 1:52 pm

I can say for sure that Englewood Pilsen and Humboldt Park are not in his mind...they've got a rep for being wild hoods, especially Englewood

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 30th, 2005, 2:09 pm

FLUID wrote:Yeah a LA Stone would get love from a MoeTown or TerrorTown Stone but they gon' test him first, no doubt. A LA Stone most likely gon be tatted up that "BPSB" sign so I think he'll be alright. But then again a LA Stone might have to click up with a renegade Stone deck(Apache, Titanic, Jet Black, etc) cause they draw different like LA Stones.

i meant that question for someone from cali,or better yet a BPS Blood member,Fluid.since we are both from the mid west,we only know about the BPSN that are people.

when they test him,they are going to ask him to recite literature,which is a chi/midwest thing.I dont think cali BPS Bloods even go by lit.

a BPS blood probably wouldnt even know how to do the BPS(people) handshake

I know the ABPSN from the mid west wont consider a BPS blood a member of the same organization,because they arent.But weather they would respect each other or not is something diffrent.Ive asked a few Stones and they dissed the cali BPS Bloods.But that was only those individial Stones opinions,another Moe might think diffrently.

FLUID
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 455
Joined: March 7th, 2004, 6:27 pm
Location: ROCKTOWN,IL

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by FLUID » January 30th, 2005, 5:57 pm

It's all in your mind! I aint never heard of no humbolt park, englewood, an pilsen. Never heard any news stories, no movies, no documentaries, nothing. WHY-IS-THAT??[/quote]

Why Is That? Cause when it comes to golrifying gangs and shit, the media only focuses on LA. All the gang movies only been filmed in Watts, Compton, and South Central. They love to exploit LA.

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 30th, 2005, 7:28 pm

also,no sane person would go into humboldt park trying to film the Kings or Maniacs,or into englewood trying to film the GDs or BDs lol

its called ''wanting to stay alive""

User avatar
Lonewolf
Super Heavy Weight
Super Heavy Weight
Posts: 4167
Joined: June 2nd, 2004, 4:57 pm
Country: Mexico
If in the United States: California
What city do you live in now?: Tijuana
Location: THE BORDERLAND
Contact:

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by Lonewolf » January 31st, 2005, 10:34 am

Any Jamaican Posee's in Chicago?

FLUID
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 455
Joined: March 7th, 2004, 6:27 pm
Location: ROCKTOWN,IL

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by FLUID » January 31st, 2005, 11:12 am

lonewolf wrote:Any Jamaican Posee's in Chicago?
I really couldn't tell you. But I know the Chi does have a nice little Jamaican population and they throw the Jamaican Fest on 50th-somethin street in the summertime. They got some Jamaican restaurants on the Southside(I never got a chance to taste that jerk chicken). And one year I heard that when the mobs got real hot on the streets, the Jamaicans took over the drug scene. So they probably do got some Jamaican knuckleheads in the City but the mobs still run that shit.

User avatar
Lonewolf
Super Heavy Weight
Super Heavy Weight
Posts: 4167
Joined: June 2nd, 2004, 4:57 pm
Country: Mexico
If in the United States: California
What city do you live in now?: Tijuana
Location: THE BORDERLAND
Contact:

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by Lonewolf » January 31st, 2005, 2:06 pm

Without going into the whole deal of reciting the whole script or compromising anybodys rules, what can you put up as to "A RECITAL"?

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 31st, 2005, 5:37 pm

Im not going to post anyones lit,i can offer general info on how things are in the mid west and i can post news articles but thats it

User avatar
Lonewolf
Super Heavy Weight
Super Heavy Weight
Posts: 4167
Joined: June 2nd, 2004, 4:57 pm
Country: Mexico
If in the United States: California
What city do you live in now?: Tijuana
Location: THE BORDERLAND
Contact:

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by Lonewolf » January 31st, 2005, 5:40 pm

blackmanofhonor wrote:Im not going to post anyones lit,i can offer general info on how things are in the mid west and i can post news articles but thats it
I understand.
But from what you know, is does every single gang have its own? or do they have a common constitution for FOLKS, PEOPLES, ETC?

blackmanofhonor
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1690
Joined: December 25th, 2004, 10:40 am
Location: Mil town,WIS

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by blackmanofhonor » January 31st, 2005, 6:05 pm

each Nation has its own lit book but some have similar concepts

Rollin_inmy_SixFo
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 556
Joined: January 29th, 2004, 2:49 pm
Location: LA

Re: L.A. GANGS ~versus~ CHICAGO GANGS

Unread post by Rollin_inmy_SixFo » January 31st, 2005, 7:25 pm

FLUID wrote:It's all in your mind! I aint never heard of no humbolt park, englewood, an pilsen. Never heard any news stories, no movies, no documentaries, nothing. WHY-IS-THAT??
Why Is That? Cause when it comes to golrifying gangs and shit, the media only focuses on LA. All the gang movies only been filmed in Watts, Compton, and South Central. They love to exploit LA.[/quote]

Or they just don't think Chicago is worth it. And it probaly aint.

Post Reply