Problems found with some LAPD probes of officers’ alleged bias

by Joel Rubin (LA Times)
November 10, 2009


An independent examination of how the Los Angeles Police Department investigates officers accused of profiling people based on race, gender or sexual orientation found serious problems with a third of the sampled investigations, the inspector general for the L.A. Police Commission reported Tuesday.

In six of 20 LAPD investigations into allegations of “biased policing” — the department’s new name for what has traditionally been termed racial profiling — police failed to interview witnesses, did not ask important questions or made similar mistakes, concluded Andre Birotte, the inspector general, in the 41-page report.

Birotte’s staff also found problems with the resolution of several cases, saying supervisors’ decisions not to discipline the officers were “not based on information gathered” or “appeared to be unsupported because the underlying investigation was incomplete.”

LAPD Cmdr. Rick Webb, who oversees internal affairs, agreed that some of the errors highlighted in the report had been made, but disputed the conclusion that they affected the investigations’ outcomes.

How the department handles claims of biased policing has become a high-profile issue in the last few years. The commission, led by President John Mack, began pressing for reforms after it realized that the department, at least since 2001, had dismissed all of the hundreds of allegations of profiling filed against officers each year.

Former Chief William J. Bratton defended the results, arguing that, without a confession from the officer, it is impossible to assess whether the officer made a traffic stop or took some other police action because of a secret bias.

The department set out to revamp how it investigates claims of bias, and last spring it adopted a new set of protocols for the inquiries. Both Webb and Assistant Inspector General Susan Hutson told commission members that the cases reviewed in the report were concluded shortly after the changes went into effect and cautioned that it was too early to assess whether the new guidelines were having an impact. The inspector general is expected to return to the issue in coming months.

Despite intense efforts to train the department’s roughly 100 internal affairs investigators in the new protocols and to improve quality controls, there will always be a risk of incomplete or imperfect investigations, Webb warned.

Instead of wading into the murky waters of the motives behind an officer’s decision to detain or search a suspect, Webb suggested, the department should put greater focus on the more discernible question of whether the officer’s actions were legal.

Posted by on Nov 10 2009. Filed under Good Cop / Bad Cop. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

1 Comment for “Problems found with some LAPD probes of officers’ alleged bias”

  1. very nice, I have been trying to look for this. Thanks!

Leave a Reply


Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Photo Gallery

Log in |
  • My Kingdom Come – 2015
  • Hispanic Gangs
  • Homies Figures – The Original Homies
  • Prison Gangs
  • The Inside Man – Confidential Informant, Los Angeles Gangs & the LAPD
  • Email
  • Connecticut Drug Threat Assessment report – 2003
  • Dianne Feinstein Report, The Gang Prevention and Effective Deterrence Act: Combating the Spread of Gang Violence – 2003
  • National Alliance of Gang Investigators 2005
  • L.A. Area Terrorized by Marauding Youngsters
  • Other Cities
  • Three persons were killed by shotgun blast in hotel on Vermont Avenue, 1979
  • Jamiel’s Law, proposed by Mayoral candiate Walter Moore
  • Los Angeles Police Gang Enforcement Initiaitives – 2007
  • Passing of Vincent A Alonso
  • SG Music Group
  • Crip Gangs
  • Bloods
  • Asian Gangs
  • Forums
  • Shop
  • Injunctions
  • contact
  • Resources